Ginger men who now identifies as a woman.

If its true how can governments not admit it?

I'll be honest I'd never heard of it until you mentioned it.....(theres some ammo for ya)
So arguments fomenting discrimination, hatred and potential violence against transpeople, and transwomen in particular, have no basis on moral, scientific, or legal grounds?
 
If they are a man? Not sure what law but im a man and I wouldn't use the womens.
Because you don't want to. You feel more comfortable using the men's.
There's nothing wrong with that. Why do you insist others should not use the toilets they are most comfortable using?

BTW, there is no law that stops men using women's or women using men's toilets.
It's a TERF activist campaign against transgender people, including the pyrrhic Supreme Court judgement.
It applies only in situations governed by the Equalities Act 2010.
 
Because you don't want to. You feel more comfortable using the men's.
There's nothing wrong with that. Why do you insist others should not use the toilets they are most comfortable using?

BTW, there is no law that stops men using women's or women using men's toilets.
It's a TERF activist campaign against transgender people, including the pyrrhic Supreme Court judgement.
It applies only in situations governed by the Equalities Act 2010.
Nonsense, I already posted the law to you regards this, you didn't accept it but that isn't really surprising. You are simply trolling.
 
Nonsense, I already posted the law to you regards this, you didn't accept it but that isn't really surprising. You are simply trolling.
Remind me? When, where?
I remember disputing, disproving and refuting your supposed law.

Let's see who is trolling.
 
Why do you insist others should not use the toilets they are most comfortable using?

Now there's an interesting question.

Let's suppose a woman, at work as a nurse, in the middle of the night, has an unexpectedly heavy period and wants to go to the women's changing room, where she feels most comfortable, and left her bag, to remove and change her clothes and underwear, and clean up.

She feels most comfortable in a reserved women's room. Not a man's room, or a multisex room.

Let's suppose a man, we'll call him Dr Uptonogood, likes going into the women's changing room wearing a bra under his overalls, and gets into a row with her when she tells him it is a women's room, and he should not be there, because he is a man.

Does the man have more right to use the women's changing room, than the woman?

He and his supporters used to say yes.
 
Now there's an interesting question.

Let's suppose a woman, at work as a nurse, in the middle of the night, has an unexpectedly heavy period and wants to go to the women's changing room, where she feels most comfortable, and left her bag, to remove and change her clothes and underwear, and clean up.

She feels most comfortable in a reserved women's room. Not a man's room, or a multisex room.

Let's suppose a man, we'll call him Dr Uptonogood, likes going into the women's changing room wearing a bra under his overalls, and gets into a row with her when she tells him it is a women's room, and he should not be there, because he is a man.

Does the man have more right to use the women's changing room, than the woman?

He and his supporters used to say yes.
She and her employers recognised her as a woman. She had the right to use the women's changing rooms.
Dr Upton was found not have acted unlawfully. So she had every right to use that room.
In that case the complainant was aa Trump supporter and supported his ideology.
Therefore it's reasonable to accept that she was an TERFactivist, who strive to demonise transgender people. The typical comments on here justify that claim.

The transwomen in that case was cleared of all accusations.

But your attempt to demonise transgender people, transwomen in particular does not go unnoticed: "we'll call him Dr Uptonogood,"

Your TERF activism is fomenting hatred, discrimination and potentially violence against transgender people.
It's irrational and illogical because you refuse to accept that they exist. :rolleyes:
 
Obviously, you're the troll.
You claim to have presented a law that states what you claim it states, but when asked to produce the post, you disappear in a cloud of virtual dust. :rolleyes:
Funny isn't it how you can drag up posts from various dates and differet threads yet you can recall disagreeing with the law that I presented and now want me to find something that you remember. Don't make me laugh.
 
Back
Top