Ginger men who now identifies as a woman.

[King Billy]

More verbose rambling, false accusations, and irrelevant fantasies from Billy.

Still no rational explanation from John for his fanatical refusal to accept that intersex babies are born and grow up to become transgenders, after suffering IGM.
John denounces FGM, as he should, but he's not bothered, in the slightest by IGM, 3,000 per year preformed on NHS.
He can't be bothered because he believes the, 3,000 recorded procedures each year, don't exist.

A man is not a woman, does not change into one, and is not entitled to demand access to places and events reserved exclusively for women.

The words 'man' and 'women' refer to gender as well as sex.
If you're not aware of that distinction, you really shouldn't be trying to discuss that which you can't understand.

Three painful truths that Billy cannot bear to hear.

I am sad to see the UK Supreme Court make a judgement based on being “biologically nonsensical” and “scientifically illiterate”, and which is unenforceable.
JohnD thinks it's a triumph for the TERFS because he thinks it can be enforced.

 

[JohnD]

Poor billy continues to make up false stories.

He's really anxious for men to have the right to go into women's toilets. The thing I've objected to.

 

[King Billy]

Poor billy continues to make up false stories.

For example?

He's really anxious for men to have the right to go into women's toilets.

JohnD has only ad hominem insults in his toolkit because he has no rational explanation for his fanatical beliefs.

The thing I've objected to.

How are you going to enforce the judgement?

You prefer to see someone like one of these in the women's toilets:

Than someone like one of these:

 

[Highway Man]

Weirdos hanging around womens changing rooms and toilets. For what reason do you think it is right Billy?

 

[JohnD]

The words 'man' and 'women' refer to gender as well as sex.

I see that Billy doesn't know what the words "man" and "woman" mean.

Perhaps that's the root of his hallucinations.

 

[Highway Man]

For example?


JohnD has only ad hominem insults in his toolkit because he has no rational explanation for his fanatical beliefs.


How are you going to enforce the judgement?

You prefer to see someone like one of these in the women's toilets:
View attachment 413072
Than someone like one of these:
View attachment 413073

To be honest, they all look like men dressed as women, its a little embarasing you even thinking that they are, just because they pop a bikini on.

 

[JohnD]

fanatical beliefs.

I believe that a man is not a woman.


Fanatical?

My asre.

 

[King Billy]

I see that Billy doesn't know what the words "man" and "woman" mean.

Perhaps that's the root of his hallucinations.

JohnD can't understand that the labels 'man' and 'woman' refer to gender as well as sex.
As he refuses to accept the concept of 'gender' it's no wonder he doesn't understand the difference between sex and gender.
And in his ignorance he has the audacity to try to discuss the meanings of 'man' and 'woman'.

And still not an iota of a rational reason for his refusal to recognise the existence of interse and transgenders.
Just meaningless slogans and ad hominem arguments.

So strong is his fanatical and irrational TERFism, it's left hime devoid of modern scientific and biological knowledge.

 

[King Billy]

I believe that a man is not a woman.


Fanatical?

My asre.

What is the difference between 'sesx' and 'gender'?
You can't answer because you refuse to accept that the word 'gender' exists and has meaning, and differs from sex.

Such is your fanaticism and irrational belief.

 

[King Billy]

Weirdos hanging around womens changing rooms and toilets. For what reason do you think it is right Billy?

Ad hominem argument.
It shows you're incapable of constructing and argument against my scientific and biological awareness so you construct an imaginary argument to counter.
And when your imaginary argument is refuted you go crying to the mods to have the thread deleted.
Hardly the behaviour of a great military strategist, more like the behaviour of a cowardly clown, who can't recognise a war crime when he sees it.

I'm sure the rest of the contributors to that thread will be grateful to you for wasting their time.

 

[Highway Man]

What is the difference between 'sesx' and 'gender'?
You can't answer because you refuse to accept that the word 'gender' exists and has meaning, and differs from sex.

Such is your fanaticism and irrational belief.

The irrational belief is that you think that you are a different gender from your sex

 

[Highway Man]

Ad hominem argument.
You're incapable of constructing and argument against my scientific and biological awareness so you construct an imaginary argument to counter.
And when your imaginary argument is refuted you go crying to the mods to have the thread deleted.
Hardly the behaviour of a great military strategist, more like the behaviour of a cowardly clown, who can't recognise a war crime when he sees it.

For your information, if you read any of my great military strategies that I post on here and predictions of any outcomes, that are always correct, and incidently I post them well before they happen and not after reading about them happening in the news. So yes you are correct in calling me a great military strategist.

 

[King Billy]

To be honest, they all look like men dressed as women, its a little embarasing you even thinking that they are, just because they pop a bikini on.

To be honest it's a bit embarasing (sic) even thinking you are a great military strategist, just because you choose to excuse war crimes when they're presented.
To be honest it's a bit embarasing (sic) even thinking you can present an argument when you go crying to the mods when you've been embarrassed.

Is your finger hovering over the Report button again, or does it rest there permanently?

Is that the object of your trolling, to get the thread deleted.
You'd be in JohnD's favour saving him from the embarrassment for his irrational and fanatical belief.

 

[King Billy]

 

[Highway Man]

To be honest it's a bit embarasing (sic) even thinking you are a great military strategist, just because you choose to excuse war crimes when they're presented.
To be honest it's a bit embarasing (sic) even thinking you can present an argument when you go crying to the mods when you've been embarrassed.

Is your finger hovering over the Report button again, or does it rest there permanently?

Is that the object of your trolling, to get the thread deleted.
You'd be in JohnD's favour saving him from the embarrassment for his irrational and fanatical belief.

Stick to the topic please.