Ginger men who now identifies as a woman.

And the nearest you can get to a discussion is childish ad hominem arguments, strawman arguments and meaningless slogans.
A perfect example of the lack of any meaningful argument
.| | | |
VVVV

And the nearest you can get to a discussion is childish ad hominem arguments, strawman arguments and meaningless slogans.
You disappoint me, JohnD. You're reduced to such meaningless posts because a TERF's motivation is hatred and irrational fear for people they don't believe exist.
It's an irrational denial of people's existence which is based on biological nonsense, medical scientific illiteracy and legal confusion.
 
Isn't there a thread somewhere that you have some understanding of, that you could go and troll there?
Oh, you're already trolling there as well:-


:rolleyes:
Why do you care what I do?....

1777364376167.gif
 
Why do you care what I do?....

View attachment 413568
When you're posting in some of the threads that have become banal through your irrelevant, pointless contributions and trolling, I don't care.
But I do care when you insist on reducing all the threads with your irrelevant nonsense, pointless contributions and trolling.

If you have nothing to say, you're not obliged to say anything.
 
When you're posting in some of the threads that have become banal through your irrelevant, pointless contributions and trolling, I don't care.
But I do care when you insist on reducing all the threads with your irrelevant nonsense, pointless contributions and trolling.

If you have nothing to say, you're not obliged to say anything.
Did I say anything to you?
 
Language is alive, it evolves.
or the speakers are left behind in their out-dated, irrational or indoctrinated beliefs, like Piers Morgan, J K Rowling and JohnD

Piers Morgan, like J K Rowling and JohnD, is insisting his concept of the meaning of "woman" is the correct meaning.
He is refusing, through his personal ideology, to accept that there are more than one concept of the meaning of woman. That indicates a closed mind.
 
Last edited:
Language is alive, it evolves.

or the speakers are left behind in their out-dated, irrational or indoctrinated beliefs, like Piers Morgan, J K Rowling and JohnD

Piers Morgan, like J K Rowling and JohnD, is insisting his concept of the meaning of "woman" is the correct meaning.
He is refusing, through his personal ideology, to accept that there are more than one concept of the meaning of woman. That indicates a closed mind.

An interesting angle on the subject - can a person born with male chromosomes ( but whose body develops with female physical characteristics due to hormonal issues) ever be perceived as a woman?
 
An interesting angle on the subject - can a person born with male chromosomes ( but whose body develops with female physical characteristics due to hormonal issues) ever be perceived as a woman?

Woman is defined as a gender, as well as a biological sex, in modern day dictionaries such as the Cambridge Dictionary, referred to in previous post.


The Supreme Court judgement determined the legal meaning of the word "woman" only as far as the Equality Act 2010 was concerned.
 
Woman is defined as a gender, as well as a biological sex, in modern day dictionaries such as the Cambridge Dictionary, referred to in previous post.

Nobody - or at least, hardly anyone - carries a dictionary along to discern the finer points of society conventions. People tend to say what they see and without a clear distinction, misunderstandings will accumulate as such arrangements are considered for a minority of our population.

The Supreme Court judgement determined the legal meaning of the word "woman" only as far as the Equality Act 2010 was concerned.

Would you prefer an amendment that goes further to be considered?
 
Woman is defined as a gender, as well as a biological sex

In reality, however, a "woman" is an adult human female.

Not a man who has uttered the magic words "I am a woman."

You can carry on flogging your Findus meat pie, but it will never grow hooves and carry you to victory.
 
The Supreme Court judgement determined the legal meaning of the word "woman" only as far as the Equality Act 2010 was concerned.

The Supreme Court knows what a woman is, as do we all, and has said so on the only occasion it was asked.

Do you fantasise that it would stop knowing, if it was asked again?

Feel free to try,
 
In reality, however, a "woman" is an adult human female.

Not a man who has uttered the magic words "I am a woman."

You can carry on flogging your Findus meat pie, but it will never grow hooves and carry you to victory.
You will carry on with your meaningless slogans, ad hominem attacks and strawman arguments, but your TERF activism based on medical scientific illiteracy, biological nonsense and legal confusion will always remain irrational.
 
Back
Top