• Looking for a smarter way to manage your heating this winter? We’ve been testing the new Aqara Radiator Thermostat W600 to see how quiet, accurate and easy it is to use around the home. Click here read our review.

GPs to get £20 bonus for keeping patients out of hospital

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 317777
  • Start date Start date
It’s been explained.

If you don’t agree “shock” I can’t change that.
Yes you’ve explained you are totally ignorant on the subject

“Shock” you are repeating your ignorance.
 
So where's the scam? How is cutting waiting times by using modern joined up care a trick?

This should reduce the load on hospitals, improving waiting times and get faster care through the system by getting GPS prescribing required blood tests before the first hospital appointment or going to the right team.

How is this a bad idea?
 
Heres a trial where hospital appointments were reduced by 15% because cases where a hospital appointment wasn't needed were filtered out. The Hospital consultants were able to manage three times as many consultations because the GP could effectively provide the background information.


Here's a separate study where they reduced new appointments by 16%.

The NHS bean counters have checked and it is a big saving.

Advice and guidance was first introduced in 2015, it’s been around a long time

Sadly you are wasting your time presenting facts…..we live in a post fact world and these people on here won’t listen to facts, they only want to spread prejudice and blind faith.
 
Heres a trial where hospital appointments were reduced by 15% because cases where a hospital appointment wasn't needed were filtered out. The Hospital consultants were able to manage three times as many consultations because the GP could effectively provide the background information.


Here's a separate study where they reduced new appointments by 16%.

The NHS bean counters have checked and it is a big saving.
Thanks, very useful links I’m just reading through them now.
 
It is interesting that the people screaming the NHS is massively inefficient are the same people who call a policy to improve efficiency and proven to do so, a scam.
 
So where's the scam? How is cutting waiting times by using modern joined up care a trick?

This should reduce the load on hospitals, improving waiting times and get faster care through the system by getting GPS prescribing required blood tests before the first hospital appointment or going to the right team.

How is this a bad idea?

From your link. I can't get my head round what these figures mean!

The team estimates that up to three A&G requests can be completed in the time required to see a new patient in clinic. Essentially this means that as long as half of A&G requests are either providing the GP with advice, or sending a patient STT, it ensures that the service is maximising efficiency against the traditional approach of seeing all patients in clinic.
 
From your link. I can't get my head round what these figures mean!
The A&G call (on average) needs to make a difference in some way to be worth doing.

If they can reduce the number of appointments needed or speed care by getting tests ordered so they've got the results for the first appointment, or help avoid unnecessary hospital referrals then it saves money.

Some A&G calls won't make a difference to the treatment outcome at all, and that's fine as long as half of them do make some difference. If it's less than half then they're not saving money or working more efficiently.
 
From your link. I can't get my head round what these figures mean!
The bit you highlighted is rather hard to make sense of.

I can see there is a cost saving of a Gp sending a patient SST straight to test, rather than referral to secondary care clinic for appointment then book a test from that.

It also shortens treatment time as it cuts out at least 1 waiting list.
 
  • Concerns about rejection of referrals:
    While "rejections" are infrequent, there are concerns that A&G might be used to decline necessary referrals.
 
The A&G call (on average) needs to make a difference in some way to be worth doing.

If they can reduce the number of appointments needed or speed care by getting tests ordered so they've got the results for the first appointment, or help avoid unnecessary hospital referrals then it saves money.

Some A&G calls won't make a difference to the treatment outcome at all, and that's fine as long as half of them do make some difference. If it's less than half then they're not saving money or working more efficiently.
From what I have read in the past, other healthcare systems across Europe, like Germany have a more flexible referral system compared to ours.

In U.K. we’ve always had Gps acting as gate keepers to secondary care, what has happened is once a gp has decided to refer, they have just done so blindly.

The A&G system is based on Gps making more targeted diagnosis so they can make more targeted referrals or send patients direct to testing without an initial assessment by a consultant.


Our system does need things like this, we should give a chance
 
So where's the scam?
Reducing waiting times, more convenience for patients, saving money, increasing efficiency meaning better use of hospital facilities and staff.

Can't you see the scam, it's right in front of you...
 
  • Concerns about rejection of referrals:
    While "rejections" are infrequent, there are concerns that A&G might be used to decline necessary referrals.
See the word ‘infrequent’

Have a think
 
Reducing waiting times, more convenience for patients, saving money, increasing efficiency meaning better use of hospital facilities and staff.

Can't you see the scam, it's right in front of you...
It’s impossible to win a rational argument with somebody that doesn’t care about logic.

This thread is an example of uninformed people trying to argue something they know nothing about…..but which an opinion based on prejudice and blind faith.
 
You are completely wrong, but I am interested to know how you reached your belief..............So why do you think an A&G request is simply moving a cursor from one box to another?



Perhaps we should look to see what healthcare professionals think about it................here is a practice manager:

Preparing and submitting a detailed A&G request, reviewing specialist advice, adjusting care plans, and handling associated administration requires considerable effort. I’ve read that the minimum costing for any hospital outpatient appointment starts at £150, which makes the £20 A&G payment somewhat underwhelming. The initial feedback from the GPs here is that it’s laughable, especially given that the BMA has advised practices to stop engaging with A&G pathways as part of its collective action.”


the BMA had this on their collective action list:

"Stop engaging with the e-Referral Advice & Guidance pathway – unless it is a timely and clinically helpful process for you in your professional role."

Why?

A = Dr Katie Bramall-Stainer said the advice to stop A&G as part of collective action was added to the BMA ‘menu’ because it is ‘unresourced workload transfer’. It can ‘lead to lengthy back and forth discussions with further requests for GP actions’.



I see gas112 still has no response to facts.

gas112 repeatedly claimed A&G is “touch of a button” I’ve provided evidence from actual,GPS and Practice managers showing otherwise……and gas112 has avoided responding.
 
See the word ‘infrequent’

Have a think
And your point is ?
I see gas112 still has no response to facts.

gas112 repeatedly claimed A&G is “touch of a button” I’ve provided evidence from actual,GPS and Practice managers showing otherwise……and gas112 has avoided responding.
I see gas112 still has no response to facts.

gas112 repeatedly claimed A&G is “touch of a button” I’ve provided evidence from actual,GPS and Practice managers showing otherwise……and gas112 has avoided responding.
i see notch is incapable of reading and not read the reply pages ago perhaps matron was changing your nappy at the time or you were busy buying more premium bonds.
.
I see notch believes everything he reads on the internet from those who are wanting to profit from any changes where as gas112 is speaking face to face with someone who actually does it
 
Back
Top