Would like some opinions on 'special circumstances' with regards to green belt.
I have a site which is perfect for the development of a house. Every aspect has been accounted for e.g. access, contributes to local amenity, does not encroach in any possible way on other properties etc.
My only issue is that it is greenbelt... However, a independent local green belt review specifically highlights the exact site as an 'anomaly' that does not serve any purpose and should be considered for reallocation.
The greenbelt land in question (50m squared) is presently covered in tarmac and abandoned. Do you think this would be acceptable as a 'special circumstance' for reallocation?
I have a site which is perfect for the development of a house. Every aspect has been accounted for e.g. access, contributes to local amenity, does not encroach in any possible way on other properties etc.
My only issue is that it is greenbelt... However, a independent local green belt review specifically highlights the exact site as an 'anomaly' that does not serve any purpose and should be considered for reallocation.
The greenbelt land in question (50m squared) is presently covered in tarmac and abandoned. Do you think this would be acceptable as a 'special circumstance' for reallocation?