I wasn't speaking for all of us, so I see no need to change anything.Pensdown said:Please change the "we" to "I" as you don’t speak for all of us.
I don't align with your pigeonholing of my point as political correctness. If you have a problem with me pointing out what was a derogatory comment, your best course of action is to ask people not to make derogatory comments, instead of asking people not to object to them.Pensdown said:Some of us are more interested in the post than your political correctness.
Despite that fact that I didn't jump in, any more than any other poster ever jumps in, and despite the questionable sincerity of your request, my view is that harmonisation is a microcosm of the current congress towards less confusion and less risk.Pensdown said:And seeing as you jumped in, what’s your view on the subject of harmonisation?
It never made any sense to me to have harmonised insulation colours for flex but not for structural cable. It's a pity that the changes for three-phase are quite radical, but there always was scope for f*ck ups with three phase anyway; only the other day I came across an installation with two of the phases in red, and the other phase, and the neutral, in black.
The declared goal of harmonisation was, and is, conformity; since that goal is being achieved, the only question is whether or not the action being taken is, on balance, the best compromise.
IMHO, it is.
