- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 25,100
- Reaction score
- 5,499
- Country
Would be statutory redundancy unless they wanted mass claims for unfair dismissal. Management could argue reasonable request angle. So by no means would it be a slam dunk case.
IKEA
- Thread starter transam
- Start date
More foreigner hatred from Andy.
it’s funny how you never seem to notice any white crime, obviously it doesn’t happen
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 22,956
- Reaction score
- 3,099
- Country
It's more than that as it is now illegal to employ someone in the NHS who has a patient facing role after 1st April. That's why it has been enshrined in law, the NHS can rely on it to dismiss or redeploy people.
Agreed it is difficult for other organisations as there may be a case for constructive dismissal.
The only group that could do anything about it is the supreme court. I'm not sure an ordinary judge could. The supreme lot - not so sure.
Anyway it's already been done in care homes. It doesn't seem to have caused them any further problems. They just have the ones they already had.
Biden made a statement concerning any company that dealt with the state a while ago and reports suggest companies are saying jab or no job.
Trump may be on his way back too. The fiddled election aspect is still believed by his supporters.
Anyway it's already been done in care homes. It doesn't seem to have caused them any further problems. They just have the ones they already had.
Biden made a statement concerning any company that dealt with the state a while ago and reports suggest companies are saying jab or no job.
Trump may be on his way back too. The fiddled election aspect is still believed by his supporters.
- Joined
- 16 Sep 2021
- Messages
- 2,884
- Reaction score
- 30
- Country
That link is to someone's biography. It has nothing about tariffs nor children's shoes.
Who overheard who, when, where?
What other utterings, by various what?
"Agreeing with with we beat them during the war" WTF does this mean?
All who did was say yes to what?
You're talking gibberish, and making no sense whatsoever.
So you asked a question and made a statement which you now admit you know nothing about!
If you don't know if it exists, how can you claim it's disgusting?
If you don't care whether it exists or not, why raise the issue?
It was your assertion and I asked you for the information.
- Joined
- 16 Sep 2021
- Messages
- 2,884
- Reaction score
- 30
- Country
andy11 trying to steer the discussion onto his favourite subject: promoting hatred and division against foreigners.
Racist never tire of being racist. It's what drives them to get out of bed. It's why they exploit every opportunity to promote racism.
Last edited:
- Joined
- 16 Sep 2021
- Messages
- 2,884
- Reaction score
- 30
- Country
They implement a change of their contract.
If it became law, the 'employers' would have to comply and the decision would be above their paygrade.
The 'dismissed' workers would have to challenge the law.
- Joined
- 16 Sep 2021
- Messages
- 2,884
- Reaction score
- 30
- Country
They have no jurisdiction in UK. So it's irrelevant.
WTF does this have to do with the issue?
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 25,100
- Reaction score
- 5,499
- Country
Yep, my US team members have had to comply already.
No comment. You shouldn't need to post anything you have. Do you feel it gets you anywhere? It wont.
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 25,100
- Reaction score
- 5,499
- Country
Thanks - I've read the legislation now. There are very limited angles an Employee could use to defend an employment termination, provided the employer had explored redeployment to a lower risk area. I suspect NHS contracts are already full of obligations on the employee to maintain the necessary legal status to work in their chosen field.
- Joined
- 16 Sep 2021
- Messages
- 2,884
- Reaction score
- 30
- Country
What? You mean we can post anything we want, and when anyone challenges our comment/opinion/assertion, we can refuse to justify it?
What planet are you on?
Sure, you can post any opinion you want, you can claim that some anonymous politician said something, but when challenged on it, I'd hope you'd at least try to justify it, not dismiss it as, "oh well, I didn't know what I was talking about".
May I correct your latest comment, I think you meant to say, "You can't post anything you don't have, and you were talking out your @rse."
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 25,100
- Reaction score
- 5,499
- Country
To be fair you are the forum expert on this subject.
- Joined
- 16 Sep 2021
- Messages
- 2,884
- Reaction score
- 30
- Country
By all means highlight any examples.
Whenever I am shown to be wrong I apologise and acknowledge my mistake. It's a shame others, such as you, don't follow my example.
You might say it's a sign of the times and add there are some USA owned companies here.
As I mentioned earlier things could change in all sorts of directions.All that can be said about the vaccination program is that it is clearly effective but has limited effect on the need for people to isolate. A wave with a lot of vaccinated people around is a good time to look at that aspect. No doubt they will. They may be already from the various studies that are going on. That has loosely established that they reduce transmission rates.
