D
dextrous
....by the fact that there are to be 6000 fewer places at universities this year after 0.5 billion drop in cash allocation, and yet the government want more people to go there? How does that work out then?
How does that work out then?
No worries, there'll be 6000 fewer of them this year, which will no doubt reflect an increase of the number of people going to university.Whinnying bloody students!
Think it varies from place to place. However, what is disheartening for the year 13 students ("upper 6th" in old money) in my school is that some of the courses they have been accepted onto have been cancelled which means having to change their preferred options, or the offers they have been given are being "upped" which is a bit of a nuisance to discover that what was ok is now no more.Hope my youngest isn't going to miss out she's determined thats the way she wan'ts to go,the 6000 less places do they cover all subjects or only certain placements.
I totally agree.Blas, now't wrong with your post - it's all related. After all, if they're cutting univ placements, or aspiring for 50% of school leavers to go to uni, then it's a perfectly reasonable question to consider the benefits of studying for a degree.
My own take on these matters is not that a degree actually "teaches" you things that you need to know for your future employment, but more that you demonstrate that you are able to understand obscure subject matters and stick with the hassle of trying to make sense of them.
This view goes right the way down the "education" scale, whether it be National Curriculum levels, GCSEs, A-levels or whatever. You are always showing your ability to understand certain levels of weird things, most of which will have no bearing nor use throughout the remainder of your life.
Again, I agree.like it or not, todays recruiters now look for degrees where they are of no practical use. you would think that nurses would be required to demonstrate hands-on practical abilities, as that is what basic nursing boils down to . so what do you need for entry?.. degrees are going to be entry level quals very soon. useful skills will be of secondary importance. it's mad.
Indeed. I've said it before and will continue to argue for having proper professional degrees for trades, a bit like apprenticeships of yesteryear but with certain differences. Thus, for example, after 3 or 4 years of study, you could walk out of a uni with a degree in plumbing which has incorporated a range of bookwork skills and knowledge plus a load of practical experience. You would, in effect, be qualfied and experienced enough to be an RGI and trade accordingly. Similar for many other trades.like it or not, todays recruiters now look for degrees where they are of no practical use. you would think that nurses would be required to demonstrate hands-on practical abilities, as that is what basic nursing boils down to . so what do you need for entry?.. degrees are going to be entry level quals very soon. useful skills will be of secondary importance. it's mad.
You know, you're going up all the time in my estimations sir. That seems to me like a VERY clever idea. Have you thought about politics? I'd vote for ya.Indeed. I've said it before and will continue to argue for having proper professional degrees for trades, a bit like apprenticeships of yesteryear but with certain differences. Thus, for example, after 3 or 4 years of study, you could walk out of a uni with a degree in plumbing which has incorporated a range of bookwork skills and knowledge plus a load of practical experience. You would, in effect, be qualfied and experienced enough to be an RGI and trade accordingly. Similar for many other trades.like it or not, todays recruiters now look for degrees where they are of no practical use. you would think that nurses would be required to demonstrate hands-on practical abilities, as that is what basic nursing boils down to . so what do you need for entry?.. degrees are going to be entry level quals very soon. useful skills will be of secondary importance. it's mad.