Immigration & foreign aid, what are we DOING?!?

[gas112]

According to World Banks Sanction Evaluation and Suspension office it’s about 0.1%

You can argue whether you agree or not….but it’s better than your blind faith and ignorance




“The World Bank’s Sanctions Evaluation and Suspension Office keeps track of cases where World Bank investigations have uncovered evidence of fraud and corruption. An analysis of cases between 2007 and 2012 found sanctionable fraud or corruption in 157 contracts worth $245 million, of which less than a third of contracts showed evidence of sanctionable corruption. The World Bank’s lending volume is about $40 billion a year, so this suggests less than a third of contracts collectively worth about 0.1 percent of volumes over the period involved discovered and sanctionable corruption.”

This world bank ?

.
,
With 188 member countries and an army of 9,000 employees and consultants, Kim will lead one of the world’s most powerful institutions--charged with saving the world’s poor--but also one of its most dysfunctional. It is an endlessly expanding virtual nation-state with supranational powers, a 2011 aid portfolio of $57 billion and little oversight by the governments that fund it. And--according to dozens of interviews over the past few weeks, atop hundreds more over the past five years, plus a review of thousands of pages of internal documents-- problems have gotten worse, not better, at the World Bank despite more than a decade of reform attempts. Kim, the Dartmouth College president tapped by President Obama to lead the bank, stands little chance of fixing things, say insiders, unless he is prepared to completely revamp the current system. “The inmates are running the asylum,” says a former director.

 

[motorbiking]

Good grief what a lot of effort you’ve gone to trying to deflect from what you said:



So did you say the above, or not?

You quote me and ask if I said it?

What do you think genius?

The alternative to charities being funded voluntarily, is for them all to be funded by the state. All 170,056 of them. Perhaps you could apply your genius to how that might work?

 

[diy_fun_uk]

good grief, how on earth did you conclude that. I've said foreign aid is charity. key word : Foreign.

or are you just being a lying troll again?

He's angry with himself due to his increasing admiration and love for Trump. He's lashing out, so I suppose we need to cut him at least a little slack.

 

[Notch7]

This world bank ?

where is your evidence?

oh thats right, you dont have any..............its just your uninformed opinion

 

[Notch7]

You quote me and ask if I said it?

What do you think genius?

The alternative to charities being funded voluntarily, is for them all to be funded by the state. All 170,056 of them. Perhaps you could apply your genius to how that might work?

you said:

I personally think charity is a personal choice. We should not pay mandatory charity via taxes

So you think disabled people should not get benefits via our tax system, you think they should be funded by charity

if a person develops MS, according to you the public should be able to choose whether to give or not.........and if not, then they can starve tough sh1t.



Im glad we cleared that up

 

[denso13]

This world bank ?

.
,
With 188 member countries and an army of 9,000 employees and consultants, Kim will lead one of the world’s most powerful institutions--charged with saving the world’s poor--but also one of its most dysfunctional. It is an endlessly expanding virtual nation-state with supranational powers, a 2011 aid portfolio of $57 billion and little oversight by the governments that fund it. And--according to dozens of interviews over the past few weeks, atop hundreds more over the past five years, plus a review of thousands of pages of internal documents-- problems have gotten worse, not better, at the World Bank despite more than a decade of reform attempts. Kim, the Dartmouth College president tapped by President Obama to lead the bank, stands little chance of fixing things, say insiders, unless he is prepared to completely revamp the current system. “The inmates are running the asylum,” says a former director.

You can do better than a magazine article from 2012, surely.

 

[mitch66]

What do you think this means:

“I personally think charity is a personal choice. We should not pay mandatory charity via taxes”

You honestly don't understand that? Even clipped out of context it's still pretty obvious. It's a harmless opinion. It's not extreme in any way. Yet you manage to find total outrage and twist the meaning so you can appease your little gang. Seriously, show what you write on here to your "family".

 

[Deleted member 317777]

You can do better than a magazine article from 2012, surely.

You’ve posted a lot worse!

 

[gas112]

You can do better than a magazine article from 2012, surely.

why do you think they have changed ? and you mean Forbes a highly respected publication

 

[Notch7]

why do you think they have changed ? and you mean Forbes a highly respected publication

I see you still haven’t provided any evidence for your claim.

 

[noseall]

You honestly don't understand that? Even clipped out of context it's still pretty obvious. It's a harmless opinion. It's not extreme in any way. Yet you manage to find total outrage and twist the meaning so you can appease your little gang. Seriously, show what you write on here to your "family".

"....he puts his left leg in..."

 

[diy_fun_uk]

You honestly don't understand that? Even clipped out of context it's still pretty obvious. It's a harmless opinion. It's not extreme in any way. Yet you manage to find total outrage and twist the meaning so you can appease your little gang. Seriously, show what you write on here to your "family".

He's increasingly tearing himself up with his conflicted feelings about feeling nice warm cosy things about Trump. So he's lashing out at us.

 

[motorbiking]

you said:

So you think disabled people should not get benefits via our tax system, you think they should be funded by charity

if a person develops MS, according to you the public should be able to choose whether to give or not.........and if not, then they can starve tough sh1t.



Im glad we cleared that up

No I don’t.

If I did, I would have said so. But I didn’t.

Benefits are not charity. Do you think the old age pension is charity or the NHS? It’s a silly notion, which you invented to attempt to claim that I am against disability benefits.