Funnily enough THEY never committed a terrorist attack against US in the uk until WE started firing OUR guns during OUR illegal invasions of THEIR countries...
You're quite right. As I keep saying, we should learn to keep our damned noses out.
Is there an answer to this insanity
- Thread starter Biguns
- Start date
You're quite right. As I keep saying, we should learn to keep our damned noses out.
Yes, I saw that. It really made me think, especially as we might well find ourselves having black-outs after the next election.
Funnily enough THEY never committed a terrorist attack against US in the uk until WE started firing OUR guns during OUR illegal invasions of THEIR countries...
You seem to have forgotten than large numbers of them are also invading OUR country. Many of them illegally.
At least when we have finished in THEIR countries (although you don't seem to have noticed that some of the terrorists were of African descent, not from the Arab world
), we fook off out of it. We're stuck with our invaders, who seek to dominate ever growing areas of The UK and increase their influence by reproducing in large numbers.Name one country we have illegally invaded that was better off after we voluntarily 'left'!
India... we drew a map and India/Pakistan/Bangladesh ended up with decades of wars!
Canada...'we' didn't actually leave - we left 'immigrants behind who took over the place
Australia...as above - 'we' didn't actually leave and we left 'immigrants behind who took over the place
S.A. ...Apartheid!
Not that good at history are you...
Any more 'examples'?
India... we drew a map and India/Pakistan/Bangladesh ended up with decades of wars!
Canada...'we' didn't actually leave - we left 'immigrants behind who took over the place
Australia...as above - 'we' didn't actually leave and we left 'immigrants behind who took over the place
S.A. ...Apartheid!
Not that good at history are you...
Any more 'examples'?
All have made much progress thanks to our input. One example being the Indian railways - probably the most extensive in the world.
As for your comments about Canada and Australia, is that the best you can come up with?
Firstly, I never said that any country was 'better off' after we left. I disagree with any intervention in these countries at the cost in our troops, the troops of our allies and taxpayers money.
The only intervention should be of small scale nuclear devices without the costs to allied troops that conventional warfare entails. This should only be used at a last resort, eg. Iran if they develop their own warheads and are likely to use them. Internal wars and coups, etc should be left for the natives to get on with. They are always fighting amongst themselves and it appears that they are quite good at it. Let them get on with it, as long as it doesn't harm our interests.
Can you name a Western country that is better off as a result of growing numbers of immigrants from a 'certain religion'? I can't. (And they will NEVER leave whilst they are leaching off the indigenous population)
They are totally selfish, insular and backward. They bring 3rd world habits and culture to 1st world countries. They offer nothing, but take all, whilst insulting and bullying those who naively provide them with everything that they need. In short, they are a drain on resources who are a dead weight that drags us down and diverts our attention from more important issues - eg. the poor state of ours and Europe's economy.
Trouble is we often don't 'leave'....whether that be immigrant wise or commerce wise!
Which is precisely what THEY thought about our incursions globally over the years!
The difference is that, after having made enormous improvements to their countries we then left them.
On the other hand, 'Those we may not name' are in no way improving our country (apart from a few curry shops) and are showing no signs of leaving.
