Israel under attack

Do you mean they actually hit the ground and exploded. Or do you just mean they entered Israeli air space. The only explosions I have seen, so far, are up in the sky as they are intercepted.
See above .... But nope if you watch the videos you will see ground explosions
 
If Israel could get flattened from conventional weapons how come the 300+ Iran sent, 99% of them got destroyed before they got to Israel

Israel would destroy Iran

99% my arse watch the videos

Where’s all the damage?

Oh that’s right, there isn’t any

oh yeah they are going to show the military bases hit etc watch the videos they are all over news sites and you tube you will see the explosions and by the way just because they got through wouldnt mean they hit anything .
This is notch's problem - he believes everything the Gov and BBC tell him, covid/vax/climate. And everything else is a conspiracy in his mind.
 
Last edited:
Cut and pasted
"
A senior US official told ABC News that at least nine missiles managed to get past the aerial defense array and hit the Nevatim Air Base and an additional IAF base in southern Israel.

Five of the missiles hit Nevatim, damaging a C-130 Hercules cargo plane, an unused runway, and empty warehouses. The other four missiles hit another base in the area, but no substantial damage was reported."
.
Now thats quite a few missiles alone hitting just two targets . I know you struggle with basic maths notch but remind us what you think 1% of 320 is ?
oh goodness me, it turns out it was only 97% not 99% -which still proves my point

"now thats quite a few missiles" er not it isnt, its about 5 more than the 99% would imply, big deal


by the way here is the link, where they talk about "extremely minor damage" ...apparently the paintwork got scratched on a military aircraft

 
oh goodness me, it turns out it was only 97% not 99% -which still proves my point

"now thats quite a few missiles" er not it isnt, its about 5 more than the 99% would imply, big deal


by the way here is the link, where they talk about "extremely minor damage" ...apparently the paintwork got scratched on a military aircraft

what bit of that was only the ones that hit two military targets are you struggling with plenty more landed elsewhere .
And no your point is not proven not even in the slightest
 
Cut and pasted
"
A senior US official told ABC News that at least nine missiles managed to get past the aerial defense array and hit the Nevatim Air Base and an additional IAF base in southern Israel.

Five of the missiles hit Nevatim, damaging a C-130 Hercules cargo plane, an unused runway, and empty warehouses. The other four missiles hit another base in the area, but no substantial damage was reported."
.
Now thats quite a few missiles alone hitting just two targets . I know you struggle with basic maths notch but remind us what you think 1% of 320 is ?
I'd heard this as well along with questions about Israel's system to take care of these. The drones in some respects are just not as effective. Some shot down by US, UK and it seems Jordan. Cruise get there more quickly than drones but take a lot longer than ballistics and are also easier to shoot down. BBC reckons the ballistics were hypersonics. Aimed at 2 air bases that will have been well defended with the correct kit.

It also seems Iran gave plenty of warning and also the intended scope and level of the attack. Attempts were made to persuade them not to do it. So called backdoor diplomacy.

Any party involved being totally clear about a number of factors in a situation like this????

It also seems that some were not launched from Iran but if cruise they might do all sorts of things. Drones it seems can do similar. Ballistics ? pass.

It seems Iran has a MIRV capability.
 
See above .... But nope if you watch the videos you will see ground explosions
That's the result of ground based interceptors. But, it doesn't really matter. Iran demonstrated the ability to deliver payload to those interceptors.
 
Ive put the link above, since gasbag didnt bother...obviously he didnt want the minor damage part to be seen
and what bit of my earlier comment about whether or not they caused damage they still got through are you struggling with ?
 
what bit of that was only the ones that hit two military targets are you struggling with plenty more landed elsewhere .
And no your point is not proven not even in the slightest
OK show us the video link then, nothing on Youtube, apart from the pothole one.
 
No they werent


It’s only taken them 780 days

Oh and Russia currently occupy 60,000 sq KMs less than they did in March 2022

The only reason they’ve been able to dominate in recent weeks is because Republicans have blocked the $60b support.
The Russians are always slow to start up but once they get going they don't look back i.e. WW2. It's not how you begin but how you finish. The americans defeated the Taliban straight up and declared victory post 9-11 only to be running with their tails between their legs 20 years later - humiliating.

This is still a hot war, so given, it can still go either way. The lines have been very stable since 22 though and the Uki counter attacks have been nothing short of a blood bath. The concern is the Russians are going to launch another offensive this summer and the morale is a lot higher than on the other side.

The strategy is also different. The US approach is drop bombs, then take over the cities and build walls, sell freedom and watch them line up at McDs. The Russians are wiping out cities and purging them of people - what this means is the land they do take, is entirely theirs, unless the other side can get it back.

The Americans becoming more and more reticent is a ominous sign. We are entering a multi-polar world and the US is losing more control each year. But it is also loosing cause because its liberal ideals are not working - for it. It has done anything but make people happier, if anything, its had the inverse effect.
It is a downward spiral. The US of today is vastly different than US on 9/11 - it is noticeably weaker, worn out, ideologically failing, and the world is moving on.

Also, social media and gen z are all too privy to what their leaders are getting up to and are not having it which is also forcing Biden's hand. There is a substantial shift and the West is in a transitionary period which makes this a very dangerous period as others clamour for the pie.
 
Back
Top