The old fair minded amongst us have very short memories.Before JD cracked up![]()
Does that apply to all journalist/tabloid related threads or just Johns?I think JD's plethora of threads is to remind us how journalists are perpetually lying and that therefore every single story he has highlighted are all just make believe and have been created in hacks' heads to sell cover.
That applies to about 98% of all threads within the G.D. section.True. However, JD has repeatedly harped on about hacks making things up (even though he clearly wasn't there and has no physical evidence). It seems entirely natural to deduce that all these threads are what he considers to be further examples of such practices![]()

For what it's worth, although I'm no racist nor an apologist for either side of the OCD arguments taking place on these threads, it does seem that there is a body of evidence such as within this http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Muslim_Statistics_-_Terrorism which perhaps should worry us all![]()
Of course human history is littered with grotesque acts of violence, but this ought not mean that we should brush off as insignificant current trends.
The old fair minded amongst us have very short memories.Before JD cracked up![]()
How come you have not mentioned the plethora of other boring repetitive same-theme posts?
I take your comment was referring John D restoring some parity to the GD section, yes/no?
He's deffo lost it, poor fellaBefore JD cracked up![]()