How is being on benefits, paying in?
I wasn't even going to bother answering but thank you.
He gets stranger by the day.
How is being on benefits, paying in?
So only people earning over a certain amount are obligated to pay NI, correct?You get NI credits for being on jobseekers allowance.
People can, and do, never work a day in their life and receive a pension at the end of it.

So nothing to do with Iran then?I see the truthless fact free scumstain has been up to his usual lying self.
Their passports? Depends whether you are dumb enough to believe liar Fromage. Do you believe Nige?So nothing to do with Iran then?



what do you think he lied about?Their passports? Depends whether you are dumb enough to believe liar Fromage. Do you believe Nige?
It seem totally nuts, that we have a system where you are deemed to have paid in, without having paid in.
What, list all of the lies?what do you think he lied about?

Fabian Society support replacing the triple lock anism, almost 65% support some restriction on pension freedohigher earners ore.
VOTE. tax tax tax on their pension savings. By a majority of two to one, Gen Z and millennials want to replace the especially for people born after 198Lns. 0 who will end up mortgaging their lives in case they need.
LABOUR. regular care in future. The situation is fter 2000. tax tax tax when they r the current system, ything just nt out that rable
FOREVER
is one of only a s with a pension pot of up y tax er on, accrual tax tax tax thdrawal stage. But d to go private.

some people want others to pay more, for the things they want but don't want to pay for.However, a new Fabian Society and Survation survey finds that 55% would support replacing the triple lock with a different mechanism, almost 65% support some restriction on pension freedoms, and 72% think higher earners should pay more tax on their pension savings. By a majority of two to one, Gen Z and millennials want to replace the triple lock, while baby boomers and the silent generation back keeping it by two to one. But a closer look reveals a more complicated picture...
A proposal to overhaul the care system on a national basis by Labour looks to offset this large gap between the generations, especially for people born after 1980 who will end up mortgaging their lives in case they need regular care in future. The situation is even worse for anyone born after 2000. They should've started saving when they started school. At this rate, under the current system, they'd have to sell everything just to buy daycare.
An option available for everyone. The person with his or her £1M pot would have paid more than double the income tax that the next person, unless it was won as the proceeds of divorce.F.boy is correct to point out that the UK’s tax treatment of pensions is also very favourable by international standards. It is one of only a handful of OECD countries where someone with a pension pot of up to £1.07m may never pay tax on a quarter of their final pension – at contribution, accrual or withdrawal stage. But the growing wealth gap means social care in future will have to be state sponsored for those who cannot afford to go private.
What, list all of the lies?
Or just the whopper he publicly vomited about those British nationals arrested at RAF Fairford being Iranian nationals?
You didn't miss much, unless you get aroused by liars.Must have missed that one.