Saying nothing would be more effective
Notchy epitomises the old adage "it is better to keep quiet and let people think you're stupid, rather than open your mouth and remove all doubt".
Saying nothing would be more effective
There we go again—A question and an answer in the same post—It’s a terrible way to be—please stop it!Do you understand tactical voting?
Obviously not
Yes it was “anything but Reform”

As pointed out before, even the reform party recognise it was tactical voting.Notchy facts.
When in reality, it was actually anything but his heroes - Labour.![]()

New deputy PM announced. This is not really going to help the confidence of the victims in the enquiry.
![]()
Conservatives call for Labour's Lucy Powell to resign over grooming gang remarks
The leader of the House of Commons later said she was "sorry" if she was "unclear" in her response to the topic being raised during a debate.news.sky.com

You are so deluded. tactical voting, would have been a conservative Vote as they have more seats.

It's a very big question, why didn't they win

Yes. I'm sure it might be noticed
Currently yes. 3 years is a long time in politics though
What it proves is that reform have got a lot more to do yet. They are still a 1 policy party

36% Voted reform. There was no "anything but Reform".

How embarrassing for Starmer.
![]()
Lucy Powell named Labour's new deputy leader
The former Commons leader beat the education secretary in a two-horse race that was widely seen as a referendum on Sir Keir Starmer's leadership.news.sky.com
Is that the members poking fun at him?![]()

Even Reforms own David Bull said ..
"I actually think the problem for us was the MRP poll, which was released two or three days ago.
"It showed us on 42%, Plaid on 38%, and it changed some people's minds.

Labour lost the seat. You do understand that?
Correct. Fromage = first loser.

No.Has any political party that has won an election won every seat they’ve fought for then?