I understand why a boiler size is important, and the losses every time a boiler switches off, however although I know we don't want a boiler to cycle, I look at these pages, and what is for sale in
Screwfix and other outlets and we have 1000's of thermostats sold which simply switch the boiler on and off.
There is a huge advertising campaign to sell Hive. This simply switches on/off, now Nest or EvoHome I could understand, but how can the industry try selling Hive on one hand, and then say we should modulate the boiler not simply switch it on/off.
I will hold up my hands, I made a mistake, OK I am an electrician not a heating guy, but I bought eTRV heads which although wifi don't actually tell the boiler what output is required. In fact don't to this day know how it should be done. Theory is great, eTRV head tells a hub (Thermostat) temperature of each room, and then the hub tells boiler how high flame should be.
But my boiler is not OpenTherm, so if I use EvoHome all it can do is turn boiler on/off, rather defeats the whole idea, and if I use the Bosch modulating thermostat it only detects the temperature of one room.
So I use the TRV to control boiler by return water temperature, so I still want a thermostat to turn off the boiler once it has reached the point where it can't turn down any further and is cycling, the installers ripped out the hard wired thermostat, so has to be wireless, cheap wireless thermostats don't fail safe, as I found out, but expensive types have anti hysteresis software built in so before the area monitored hits the set temperature it starts to cycle the boiler, but hang on whole idea is to reduce cycling not increase it.
So with whole industry in turmoil, where the major manufacturers can't get their act together to produce an integrated product, how do you expect to explain it to Joe Public?
And as to altering room temperatures through the day, again anti hysteresis software seems to make that rather hard, forget geofencing, OK I know what is wanted is for the radiator to store as little heat as possible, and to circulate the air, altering the rate of circulation to match room requirements, the radiators are made with multi speed fans which change speed to match room requirements, able to heat (and if a air con is installed also cool) the room very quickly, however these don't have TRV's so really do need a connection to the eBUS of the boiler, but I am already 67 and so likely will only need the system for 25 years, and it will take well over that time to pay back the money saved with fan assisted radiators once you look at price of building management system.
Then of course we add storage, I have seen a house with two massive well insulated tanks which takes the energy from solar panels, wood burners, and a LPG boiler and as an when required pumps it around the house, also looked at the Willis system to heat the tanks from top down, all very cleaver, but would any one live long enough to get pay back?
I went to sons first house, he left the heating on 24/7 because he said it took ages to reheat house, but could maintain the heat without a problem. It was all due to lock shield valves being wide open, once warm the TRV's reduced the flow in each radiator, but until warm the hot return water modulated the boiler so it had very low output and heated one room at a time. That is not the only house where the installers have left the property with the lock shield valves wide open, it took a lot to convince my son to turn down the radiators to get house to warm up quicker.
The installers are their own worst enemy, simple logic, last house took 4 hours to heat up with a 25 kW boiler, this is a bigger house, so it needs a bigger boiler. Fact it was all down to last house had lock shield valves wide open does not come into the equation. There are some really good installers, but also there are even more cow boys. The ones who did this house even broke the law with a power shower on a combi boiler, don't blame Joe Public, it is the industry that is to blame.