Not the essential items, no - but they might delay their car recharging, washing and drying to a more cost favourable period.
I was thinking more in terms of the supplier programming the smart meter to signal devices to run during the off-peak periods which would be of variable time and duration. As I understand it, at least with a teleswitch, a typical E7 tariff only guarantees you a minimum or 7 hours at cheap rate overnight - but not the timing of it, or even if it's in one period. But since the meter provides a signal to say when the meter is on cheap rate, that is not really a problem for many loads.... since know-one is going to spend their life continually interrogating their meter to ascertain the price of electricity at each point in time
Which is presumably why our joined up PTB is suggesting itFor most people, running appliances, particularly tumble driers, whilst they were asleep would be regard as a safety risk.
... but then we'd be back to needing 'smart appliances', or 'smart boxes' to control regular appliances.I was thinking more in terms of the supplier programming the smart meter to signal devices to run during the off-peak periods which would be of variable time and duration.
I've never had a teleswitch, so have no idea how they do things (and it may well vary between suppliers, anyway). However, I've had E7 for well over 30 years, and the cheap-rate periods have always been fixed ('guaranteed') and hence predictable. When (many years ago now) my E7 system ran off an electro-mechanical time-switch, the cheap rate period was always the same, the precise timing depending on how the clock had been set. Since I have had an electronic meter with built-in clock, the cheap-rate period has been (with two suppliers) been 'guaranteed to be 00:30 to 07:30 GMT every day.As I understand it, at least with a teleswitch, a typical E7 tariff only guarantees you a minimum or 7 hours at cheap rate overnight - but not the timing of it, or even if it's in one period.
Teleswitches were very commonly fitted for quite a few years - the signal being transmitted from Droitwich*. Several benefits for the network operators - no time switches to keep correct, and the ability to switch groups of loads at different times depending on supply and demand balance. I recall reading a contract a while ago, and it was phrased along the lines of "7 hours cheap rate guaranteed between 11pm and 8am, in no more than 2 periods". Given the ability to switch loads via contacts in the meter, this doesn't seem to be an issue for many.I've never had a teleswitch, so have no idea how they do things (and it may well vary between suppliers, anyway).
The BBC may have said that once. But the BBC have not owned any transmitters since they were sold off around 20 years ago so it will not be up to them what happens when it breaks down.Teleswitches were very commonly fitted for quite a few years - the signal being transmitted from Droitwich*. Several benefits for the network operators - no time switches to keep correct, and the ability to switch groups of loads at different times depending on supply and demand balance. I recall reading a contract a while ago, and it was phrased along the lines of "7 hours cheap rate guaranteed between 11pm and 8am, in no more than 2 periods". Given the ability to switch loads via contacts in the meter, this doesn't seem to be an issue for many.
Where I last worked, on a few occasions we'd hear the contactors pull in for the night storage heaters. Either it was a fault (noise interpreted as an "on" command) or the system was being used to temporarily add demand to the system for balancing purposes - which I believe was/is sometimes done.
I can see that something similar is likely to happen when "smart" meters are ubiquitous, probably in addition to just having "smart" appliances switching according to price.
And yes, pretty well all of these methods (with "smart" meters) rely on "smart" appliances or load switchesgetting information/commands from the meter.
* As an aside, the radio teleswitch system was supposed to have been stopped some years ago - but given teh scale of work to visit possibly millions of premises to replace the switch with something else, it hasn't happened. The BBC have said that when the BBC4 LW transmitter breaks down, it won't be repaired and they'll just decommission the transmitter.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Droitwich_Transmitting_Station
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_teleswitch
Hmmm ...The BBC may have said that once. But the BBC have not owned any transmitters since they were sold off around 20 years ago so it will not be up to them what happens when it breaks down.
Wikipedia said:... A further extension was negotiated between the Energy Networks Association and the BBC during 2019, due to the lack of progress in developing suitable smart meter alternatives. This extended the availability of the radio teleswitching service until the end of March 2021
The BBC send the signals including teleswitching, but they still don’t own the transmitter.Hmmm ...
Kind Regards, John
Maybe they don't own them, but if they have just negotiated a contract to continue providing the service until at least Match 2021, they presumably must be confident that whoever owns the equipment will keep it in working order until at least then.The BBC send the signals including teleswitching, but they still don’t own the transmitter.
more likely, the equipment modified to utilise 21st century technology.
Kind Regards, John
Indeed.Indeed. New solid state LW transmitters have recently been installed elsewhere, though I can’t remember where, maybe Ireland or Algeria.
I have no idea of what the commercial arrangement was, but it would seem rather strange if the BBC 'sold' the transmitter and entered into a contract to continue using it, but retained responsibility for 'keeping it working'. Nor am I clear as to why anyone would have wanted to buy an obsolete piece of equipment in the last stages of its life. Was this perhaps just a ('trivial') "this too" part of a much larger sale/purchase deal?It will come down to "who will pay for it ?" Arquiva may own it, but they will only run/maintain it if someone pays for it.
Quite so. Particularly if the electricity industry were going to be paying, I would have thought that the cost would fade into total insignificance in comparison with such things as the cost of the 'smart' meter nonsense.But then it comes down to what the electricity industry will pay for - given that they are pretty well tied into the system for "a few years yet" given how slowly "smart" meters are rolling out. If the lecky industry will pay for it, I'm sure Arquiva will keep the transmitter going in some form - whether that's having new valves made, converting the transmitter, or just replacing it with a lower power transmitter just for the radio teleswitch service.
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local