• Looking for a smarter way to manage your heating this winter? We’ve been testing the new Aqara Radiator Thermostat W600 to see how quiet, accurate and easy it is to use around the home. Click here read our review.

Lucy Letby......More revelations.

You think it is "appropriate" to ignore reports of multiple murders without investigating them?
I feel like I’ve done something terribly wrong, John. There were concerns expressed about child mortality rates ( and adult rates for that matter). Nobody raised murder afaik except your hypothetical analogy
 
Unless you all had greater knowledge (unshared), she is guilty.

Oh dear, more potential charges......

 
Unless you all had greater knowledge (unshared), she is guilty.
So were those people convicted over 'shaken baby syndrome'...

Until their convictions were overturned due to questionable medical evidence/opinions...

There's an awful lot of knowledgeable people who disagree with the medical evidence/opinions in her case.

Oh dear, more potential charges......
The timing of this announcement is a bit 'odd' given the recent arrests of three of her bosses...

Whatever the truth is, the system does everything it can to avoid admitting a mistake!
 
Unless you all had greater knowledge (unshared), she is guilty.

Oh dear, more potential charges......

Presumptively guilty, in a world of significant miscarriages if justice. Plod are doubling down and acting prematurely, she ain’t going anywhere.
 
It's unbelievable, a potentially floored prosecution case, an even worse defense case, managers who ignored stuff for years, now being investigated/arrested, a seemingly respectable bunch of experts calling out the prosecution, the police adding further chargers to what may have been a floored investigation in the first place, the CCRC that's not fit for service, what a bloody disgrace.
 
Let's suppose, for example, that somebody reported to a hospital director that a member of staff was committing multiple murders.

Let's suppose that the director refused to listen or investigate the report, and instead told the whistle-blower to shut up, and threatened them with the sack.

Might an investigation find that the director was criminally negligent?

Does their negligence only exist if the reports were true? What if it turned out there was only one murder? Or twenty but the evidence had been destroyed? Or if the murders had been committed, but by a different member of staff?

Is a dangerous drunk driver only guilty if he kills someone?
No. Drink driving offences require no proof of intent. Gross negligence manslaughter would likely fail if there is other criminal activity. There has to be more to these potential charges.
 
Last edited:
Irrelevant, only in trial, would all the facts accurately emerge, not in some ill informed, half baked forum.
You dismiss anything “in the media”, yet the media is how the general public hear about miscarriages of justice.

We wouldn’t know about the Post Office scandal, the infected blood scandal, the grooming gangs……without the media.

When you talk about “the media” that includes investigative journalism which over the years has uncovered lots of scandals.

only in trial, would all the facts accurately emerge
Is that true though?

It’s not unknown for trials to be flawed.

I see 3 of the managers at that hospital have been arrested.

We also know that whistleblowers in the NHS are silenced.
 
And now reviewed after a long and painstaking analysis

I have not seen an official review report following an enquiry. Have you?

You were wrong is describing her as "Presumptively guilty"
 
Back
Top