Everybody will have heard about this on the TV news programmes or read about it in the papers.
But how many of you know:
1. The cost of the investigation was more than the amount to be repaid.
2. The total amount claimed in expenses over the period investigated was £55.5 million, so the amount to be repaid is only 2.34% of the total claimed.
Was it really worth all the fuss and expense?
But how many of you know:
1. The cost of the investigation was more than the amount to be repaid.
2. The total amount claimed in expenses over the period investigated was £55.5 million, so the amount to be repaid is only 2.34% of the total claimed.
Was it really worth all the fuss and expense?