I'm saying it is not as safe, and therefore it is a lie to say that there is nothing unsafe about it.
The fact that "A" may offer increased safety over "B" does not automatically mean that "B" is unsafe. "B" can still be considered
reasonably safe even if "A" offers a
greater level of safety.
And if you really want to try and argue that any slight risk with something implies that it's a lie to say that there is nothing unsafe about it, I would suggest you consider that even with 30mA RCD protection there is still risk. A sustained shock of under 30mA can still be dangerous - even fatal - in some circumstances, not to mention that
no RCD protects against L-N shock no matter whether it's 30mA, 100mA or anything else. The only way to completely remove
all risk would be to have a system which is incapable of actually doing anything useful in the way of supplying power.
Nonsense. Our standard GFCI's here provide protection to 5mA, which is obviously better than 30mA. Should I try to claim that 30mA RCD protection is therefore unsafe?
This is here, not there.
I await with interest your explanation of how the American milliamp differs from the British milliamp.
It is no longer reasonable to use 100mA RCD protection for new sockets because putting in 30mA is a reasonable thing to so. It follows, therefore that not doing so is not reasonable, and therefore unlawful.
That is not what "reasonably safe" means. By your logic I could argue that your advice to install a 30mA RCD socket is not reasonable and would therefore be illegal because you
could use one of these instead:
https://www.mkelectric.com/en-my/Pr...ocketoutlets/RCDprotected/Pages/K6211WHI.aspx
When it was standard for whole-house protection, as in the OP's case.
It's been more than 10 years since it was 30mA for supplementary protection.
And the Wylex board and 100mA RCD in the OP's picture are clearly older than that. And 10 years ago was 2005, not exactly the dark ages of electrical safety.
Just because what is done as standard today has changed does not automatically render something done only a few years ago as being dangerous.
It renders it automatically deprecated, it renders it automatically obsolete, it renders it automatically non-compliant and it renders it automatically no longer to be advised to be done.
But it does not render it no longer reasonably safe.
You are dangerous, unhelpful, and despite all your protestations about what the law "only" requires you have no interest in it being obeyed, and you take every opportunity to encourage people to flout it, all because you don't like it and because you don't like the fact that regulations change. You make me sick.
There you go with tirade again. I have nowhere suggested that Otorongo flouts the law, and would not in any way encourage anybody to do something which I would not regard as being reasonably safe. You seem to have a very twisted interpretation of what "reasonable" and "reasonably" mean in the context in which they are being used here. The regulations, as you well know are
not law, albeit that calling them "regulations" suggests that to many people.
If you genuinely believe that sockets with 100mA protection are not
reasonably safe, then where is your advice that the OP really needs to get that "fixed" immediately? You seem to be quite happy with adding a 30mA RCD socket and leaving everything else as it is for now.
It means it is not as safe, and therefore it means that more people are likely to be harmed by relying on it, and more people will tend to die by relying on it.
Right, so you're obviously quite happy to advise the use of 30mA RCD protection, even though it's clearly not
as safe asusing the 10mA device I referred to above. Doesn't that mean that more people are likely to be harmed by relying on
your advice to use 30mA than if you had advised the use of 10mA protection?
Otorongo, I'm sorry this appears to have sunk to this level. I was merely trying to offer pragmatic advice that realistically there is nothing inherently unsafe about the 100mA RCD protection you have, even though the modern standard is for 30mA, and that, also realistically, adding one more socket with 100mA protection to a house which is already full of such sockets is not in any way anything I would be concerned about. If you were to just add the "lightweight" socket now, your printer (and you when using it) will be just as safe as wherever you have it plugged in at the moment.
As you're planning major extension works in the future, that may well involve fitting a new unit if only to provide for extra circuits, and at that time you could bring the RCD-protection to current BS7671 standards. If you get an electrician in to do that later with the extension work neither he nor your local building control are going to care one jot that you added a socket on the existing 100mA-protected circuit, assuming that you even tell them or they notice.