We live in a 1992 bungalow with a roof that can be only be described as problematic, they were the show homes for estate and I feel like they were thrown up in comparison to the rest of the homes. The roof is made up of a double pantile concrete tile and the roof has started to take some water around a vented pipe which is not major at all and the other is an area where water has degraded the felt beneath, their are issues with the lead and the soffits often pour with water in this section and some tiles that are under the hips need realigning due to sloppy DIY maintainence. The undercloaking on the verges have gone and is broken up, several of the hip ridge tiles have dropped and are in disrepair on all four of the hips and the GRP valleys need renewing with all the mortar along the valleys having pulled away from the tile. The roof felt is in good order and so are the timbers but the roof tiles have started to loose sand into the gutters and usually have to scoop this out each year albeit the tiles do not seem to be porous according to a roofer.
We had a quote to repair and replace only what was required for £7000 and new roof was between £15000-£17000.
Is this worth the repair of is it better to cut out losses and invest in a new roof?
We had a quote to repair and replace only what was required for £7000 and new roof was between £15000-£17000.
Is this worth the repair of is it better to cut out losses and invest in a new roof?
