Oh Jimmy Jimmy

[King Billy]

and this all depends if they have tried to claim assylum anywhere else.

Total nonsense as usual from the usual nonsense generator.

Asylum seekers can legally apply for asylum in multiple countries, as the 1951 Refugee Convention does not require them to claim protection in the first safe country they reach. While individuals can physically file claims in several nations, they generally cannot be granted refugee status in more than one.

Does HWM never get tired of being wrong?

 

[King Billy]

Not sure where that came from but it ignores the fact that the convention does not dictate to a state who they should and should not deem qualifies.

The UN charter dictates that posted by Securespark.
Your comment is a typical Strawman. He, and it, does not discuss whether the country should or shouldn't grant asylum to any applicants.
The country can decide the qualifying criteria and if it's ben met.

Perfectly legal to make an application inadmissible due to method of entry.

Under domestic law, yes, but the UN Charter does not, and is not changed by domestic law. Any signatory to the UN charter is bound by that UN Charter. UK is a signatory, and is therefore bound by that charter, irrespective of any domestic law.
The UN Charter overrides and negates any contradictory doemstic law.

 

[King Billy]

odds is basically a terrorist; stirring up hate and getting away with it.

Block the sausages mate.

Dec27 is a troll making false and unprovable accusations, which demonstrates his lack of sincerity and integrity.

 

[morqthana]

How would you know?

Because there's nothing in what either of them write to indicate that they mean harm to this country and are genuinely dangerous.