I confess that I missed that, but last time I tried that argument I got shot down by many people. The deemed-to-satisfy provisions of Appendix 15 of the regs certainly don't mention the possibility of having multiple accessories on an unfused spur if it's wired in 4mm² cable - but I agree that does not, in itself, mean that it is not acceptable. As I've tried arguing in the past, in terms of CCC, it's obviously fine (no different from a 32A radial circuit), but the dissenters then start moaning about the potentially high point loading of the ring (and anticipating my next argument by saying that they would also moan if I took multiple 2.5mm² spurs off very close points in the ring!).But the OP is wiring it in 4mm - do we still think that's the case?All Spark123 is saying is that an unfused spur of a ring final circuit is not allowed to supply more than one accessory, which we all know to be the case. Why are you questioning that?
Kind Regards, John.