Physics question 2

[captaincaveman1]

You say what you like sooey, doesn't bother me, speaking from your heart reveals your character.

I starting to think you're one of these young kids who doesn't think they need to prove anything and the world owes them everything. I see you're from Merseyside eh Joe doesn't like people like that, he'd not want somebody like you defending him, he'd want to be your boss and that's something I don't think you'd like at all

That post has proved to me now that you are a proper knob bet you've never been to merseyside and as for you being good at science judging by your posts you couldn't operate a bunsun burner .

 

[chapeau]

Been a long time since I used a bunsen burner. They don't have them any more in professional laboratories like you find in the workplace.

 

[joe-90]

'Any more' should be 'anymore'.

 

[chapeau]

Cheers Joe,

I'm the first to admit my English skills aren't the best. Funnily enough I was marked down to fail my English O-level but on the day I got all my adjectives out and managed to get a grade B.

This was back in the days when a B was a good grade, would be an A**** now.

Was sufficient to get me into where I wanted to go next, jumping through hoops and all that.

But you are right, we should all try to use English proper like, but I won't be pedantic and point out your next grammatical error, because you are sure to make one.

 

[joe-90]

But I'm only semi-literate. I have an excuse. I'm completely self-taught.

 

[chapeau]

No Joe, as I have said all along, your command of English is very good.

You just aren't any good at science. But if you sit back and watch you might pick up a few tips.

Hard to self teach in science nowadays, after all you need to spend time doing practical experiments and the days when you could blow up your kitchen are long gone.

Google 'scientific method' for a sort of primer on the disciplines you would be expected to master.

 

[joe-90]

No Joe, as I have said all along, your command of English is very good.

You just aren't any good at science. But if you sit back and watch you might pick up a few tips.

Hard to self teach in science nowadays, after all you need to spend time doing practical experiments and the days when you could blow up your kitchen are long gone.

Google 'scientific method' for a sort of primer on the disciplines you would be expected to master.

I've read books and watched documentaries on the subject all my life. I have a good working knowledge of how science works, but unlike you, I'm not fettered by dogma. I can think for myself.

Show me your prowess. Explain to me why the arrival of gravitons isn't accumulative like water from a hose into a bucket. You are the expert (according to you).

 

[chapeau]

well gravitons are a theoretical concept which are almost certainly out there (Einstein predicts them and his predictions are doing OK right now) but we don't currently have the technology to detect them.

The reason they don't accumulate in a bucket is because they would go straight through it. If the bucket could stop them then you would have an anti-gravity device, not bad for something you can buy in Screwfix.

(And I'm not an expert, just been trained to a higher level than most)

 

[joe-90]

well gravitons are a theoretical concept which are almost certainly out there (Einstein predicts them and his predictions are doing OK right now) but we don't currently have the technology to detect them.

The reason they don't accumulate in a bucket is because they would go straight through it. If the bucket could stop them then you would have an anti-gravity device, not bad for something you can buy in Screwfix.

(And I'm not an expert, just been trained to a higher level than most)

Oh, so were are down to 'almost certainly' are we?

How does a graviton get generated? You generate them in your body - how do you do that? How do you decide which direction they will head? If you cannot detect them - how do you know they go 'straight through'?
What you are postulating is faith - not science. Are you religious? You have the necessary mental frailty for it.

 

[sooey]

Why not persuade us you are good at something instead of just trying to put people down?

I'm quite good at spotting knobheads, though you do stand out a bit.

You say what you like sooey, doesn't bother me, speaking from your heart reveals your character.

I starting to think you're one of these young kids who doesn't think they need to prove anything and the world owes them everything. I see you're from Merseyside eh Joe doesn't like people like that, he'd not want somebody like you defending him, he'd want to be your boss and that's something I don't think you'd like at all

You forgot to tell us again how high a level you were trained to.

 

[chapeau]

Hey Joe,

I answered your question, how about a 'Thank You' ?

Just out of interest, if I had told you what you wanted to hear, would you have still found a way to take a pop at me?

 

[matt1e]

well gravitons are a theoretical concept which are almost certainly out there (Einstein predicts them and his predictions are doing OK right now) but we don't currently have the technology to detect them.
)

no doubting Einstein had a brilliant mind in his field but he has been wrong before and not all his predictions are doing ok at the moment

Matt

 

[chapeau]

Well I reckon I gave myself enough wriggle room....

Joe, why didn't you ask the question that if the graviton goes straight through the bucket then how can it pull on it?

Have you read that scientific method wiki page yet? It lets you change your mind if you are wrong. The opposite of the religious dogmatic approach to science that you propose i.e. Joe right, Joe always right, Joe cannot be wrong.

 

[joe-90]

Joe right, Joe always right, Joe cannot be wrong.

I'd agree with that.