Pound up, employment up, output up.

So, are you thinking that the UK will have different production lines to meet various minimum standards for products depending on where in the world they are destined to go?

We already do. Anything manufactured in the UK and sold for example in the US, has to be able to operate at 115v and have a different 3 pin plug. If the same item is sold to Europe, it will be 240v and a different plug again.
Nissan/Ford and other UK manufacturers have different production lines producing left and right hand driven motor vehicles.
 
Yes, and apparently Christmas puddings.

Obviously different products are manufactured, but I don't think that I was completely wrong.

Does, say, Aston Martin make a lesser car for markets with less stringent conditions - or will the cars be less good after Brexit even though some will still go to Europe?
 
Or - after brexit will there be a different production line for foods going to the US which will contain rat hairs?
 
We already do. Anything manufactured in the UK and sold for example in the US, has to be able to operate at 115v and have a different 3 pin plug. If the same item is sold to Europe, it will be 240v and a different plug again.
Nissan/Ford and other UK manufacturers have different production lines producing left and right hand driven motor vehicles.
Further -

Obviously it would be better for manufacturers if they did not have to do those different things, so -

if more different markets are needed because of brexit, then more different methods will be required which confirms what I said.
 
The UK will just assimilate EU laws/directives into UK laws/directives. We'll probably follow their standards on manufacture and goods. Probably synchronise with their services sector and adopt their licencing and restrictions etc.

Take back control - lol.


Is that a bad thing... Why change the good things?
 
The UK will just assimilate EU laws/directives into UK laws/directives. We'll probably follow their standards on manufacture and goods. Probably synchronise with their services sector and adopt their licencing and restrictions etc.

Take back control - lol.

It will be for Parliament to decide what eu laws/directives we keep.
That is taking back control boyo.
Under EU law, it is illegal to make an employee work for an average of more than 48 hours a week. John Major secured an opt-out for the UK from this directive in 1992, but six years later the Labour Government opted in.
Which is estimated to cost us £4 billion per year.

Thats the first one that needs the chop.
Go Boris go.
 
Last edited:
Under EU law, it is illegal to make an employee work for an average of more than 48 hours a week. John Major secured an opt-out for the UK from this directive in 1992, but six years later the Labour Government opted in.
Which is estimated to cost us £4 billion per year.

You are clueless.

Employees can work more than 48 hours if they want to, it isnt illegal.
Employers cant force workers to do more than 48 hours a week, but why would they.....what would an employer gain by making somebody work when tired.

It was estimated by Open Europe and proven to be utter rubbish.

How many hours do do a week in the call centre?
 
Open europe? LoL
A biased organisation full of hogwash. Just like you.

Of course open europe is biased, its a dumb eurosceptic site which creates misleading statistics that lazy journalists from the DM and Torygraph quote from without fact checking.

Im not why youve just just said your own claim comes from a site full of hogwash.
Who am I to disagree :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
 
Or - after brexit will there be a different production line for foods going to the US which will contain rat hairs?

No, as Notch pointed out earlier, we have a trade agreement with Palestine (whoever they are), I would imagine this is for the importation of sacks of goat hair, a small amount would be used for the enhancement of Jeremy Corbyns beard, the balance for insertion into food products destined for America, because of production technology, a separate production line wouldn't be required, and no rats would be harmed.
 
Of course open europe is biased, its a dumb eurosceptic site which creates misleading statistics that lazy journalists from the DM and Torygraph quote from without fact checking.

Im not why youve just just said your own claim comes from a site full of hogwash.
Who am I to disagree :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

Their is no benefit being in the eu. The eu is a con. You were sold a con and you swallowed it. heath told you no loss of sovreignty would occur.
Guess what? He lied.
Just like treacherous remoaners are lying now. Only by lying could their ideological dreams be achieved.
The eu is a failed experiment. Time to haul up the anchor and move on.
If you've got the balls.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top