Randy Andy

[AngleEyes]

A definition of Child Sexual Exploitation (CSE)

Definition of CSE
Child sexual exploitation is a form of child sexual abuse. It occurs where an individual or group takes advantage of an imbalance of power to coerce, manipulate or deceive a child or young person under the age of 18 into sexual activity (a) in exchange for something the victim needs or wants, and/or (b) for the financial advantage or increased status of the perpetrator or facilitator. The victim may have been sexually exploited even if the sexual activity appears consensual.
https://www.app.college.police.uk/a...-public-protection/child-sexual-exploitation/​

 

[ellal]

Sex with a seventeen year old is not being a paedophile.

In some jurisdictions it is

And are we to assume that you defend the actions of a royal with a trafficked girl?

A very recent court case acknowledged the crimes of the trafficker in case you hadn't noticed!

 

[EFLImpudence]

Ah typical. Someone explains the meaning of a word and is then accused of condoning the offence.

In some jurisdictions it is

No, it isn't. Paedophilia is an attraction to pre-pubescent children.
That the law calls a seventeen year old a child does not delay puberty.

And are we to assume that you defend the actions of a royal with a trafficked girl?

Stupid question.
I am merely instructing you in the meaning of a word.

A very recent court case acknowledged the crimes of the trafficker in case you hadn't noticed!

Was she accused of paedophilia? Was Epstein?

 

[motorbiking]

A definition of Child Sexual Exploitation (CSE)

Definition of CSE
Child sexual exploitation is a form of child sexual abuse. It occurs where an individual or group takes advantage of an imbalance of power to coerce, manipulate or deceive a child or young person under the age of 18 into sexual activity (a) in exchange for something the victim needs or wants, and/or (b) for the financial advantage or increased status of the perpetrator or facilitator. The victim may have been sexually exploited even if the sexual activity appears consensual.
https://www.app.college.police.uk/a...-public-protection/child-sexual-exploitation/​

This is the actual law, however.
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/part/1/crossheading/child-sex-offences

If someone coerces, manipulates or deceives someone of any age in to sex, an offence exists. So its not a well worded article.

In any case - this is a civil case for damages. One argument would be, that having burned through the 500k settlement she got already, she now fancies an additional payment, despite having made a full and final settlement. A very common occurrence with those who procure sex with money and power, rather than love and affection.

 

[ajohn]

500k settlement she got already, she now fancies an additional payment,

Fair point and we will never know even if he is convicted. Or if the offence was actually committed. I'd say he is unfortunate that he is a royal.

 

[AngleEyes]

This is the actual law, however.
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/part/1/crossheading/child-sex-offences

If someone coerces, manipulates or deceives someone of any age in to sex, an offence exists.

It does explain that later in that source I presented.

A very common occurrence with those who procure sex with money and power, rather than love and affection.

Just desserts?

 

[ellal]

Ah typical. Someone explains the meaning of a word and is then accused of condoning the offence.


No, it isn't. Paedophilia is an attraction to pre-pubescent children.
That the law calls a seventeen year old a child does not delay puberty.


Stupid question.
I am merely instructing you in the meaning of a word.


Was she accused of paedophilia? Was Epstein?

1. You are totally ignorant
2. Your views should be extremely concerning to anyone who cares for underage/vulnerable girls

 

[transam]

she has probably spent the half million dollars she got from Epstein

so needs to grub up a few squid now


scheister lawyers probably have a no win no fee deal

 

[EFLImpudence]

1. You are totally ignorant

Apparently not.

2. Your views should be extremely concerning to anyone who cares for underage/vulnerable girls

Would you care to explain how pointing out the meaning of a word to someone who has misused it has any relevance to or indication of my views on the case?

 

[noseall]

2. Your views should be extremely concerning to anyone who cares for underage/vulnerable girls

What would you class as underage?

 

[Mottie]

Sex with a seventeen year old is not being a paedophile.

In some jurisdictions it is

In some jurisdictions a girl can get married at 13. What's your point?

If Prince Andrew had sex with what he believed to be a consenting female aged 17 in the U.K, I can't see what offence has been committed.

 

[EFLImpudence]

Just to emphasise:

In some jurisdictions it is

It is NOT.

 

[ellal]

It is NOT.

Plenty of countries where the legal age of consent is 18 or over...

As I said...

1. You are totally ignorant!

Now here's another thing...

Why are teachers banned from having sex with pupils over the age of 16 in the UK despite 16 being the age of consent in the UK?

Oh that's right, they are in a position of influence...

Are we to assume that you disagree with that premise?

And was andrew not in a similar position of influence when he allegedly took advantage of a trafficked girl?

 

[ellal]

If Prince Andrew had sex with what he believed to be a consenting female aged 17 in the U.K, I can't see what offence has been committed.

Taking advantage of a trafficked girl for sexual purposes...

Unless of course you don't agree with...

"Human trafficking is defined in the UN Trafficking in Persons Protocol, which supplements the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, as "the recruitment, transport, transfer, harbouring or receipt of a person by such means as threat or use of force or other forms of coercion, abduction, fraud"

"Sometimes victims are brought into a situation of dependency on their trafficker(s), financially or emotionally. Every aspect of sex trafficking is considered a crime, from acquisition, to transportation and exploitation of victims. This includes any sexual exploitation of adults or minors"

Feel free to defend the indefensible!

 

[Mottie]

Taking advantage of a trafficked girl for sexual purposes...

Feel free to defend the indefensible!

Strange that you defend anyone until the facts are known - even someone found driving a lorry with 39 dead bodies in the back - (you soon shut up and went to ground when you were proven wrong on that - as usual) but you appear to know that Prince Andrew had sex with that girl that he knew had been trafficked. Have I got that right dear?

Yes, you carry on feeling free to find someone guilty because of your royal family prejudices......