Reform immigration plan

[motorbiking]

The term wealth inequality is relevant to a simple observation that folk like biking refuse to see.

How do wealthy people impact you? other than pay taxes to provide services that you like to benefit from.

 

[Odds]

How to wealthy people impact you? other than pay taxes to provide services that you like to benefit from.

“From each according to their ability, to each according to their needs”

 

[SPLINE]

There is indeed wealth inequality in Britain - our communist government pays its dependent block vote with the taxes of those who vote the other way.

 

[motorbiking]

“From each according to their ability, to each according to their needs”

until we all have the same?

 

[MNW67]

There is indeed wealth inequality in Britain - our communist government pays its dependent block vote with the taxes of those who vote the other way.

This one is so bizarre, I don't even know how to start to respond.

 

[MNW67]

Even the term "Wealth Inequality" is loaded with prejudice.

Report it as a hate crime

 

[motorbiking]

Do you think we should have "Wealth Equality"?

 

[motorbiking]

Report it as a hate crime

it isn't illegal to have prejudice. We'd all be in prison if that were the case.

 

[Notch7]

Farages plan to negotiate agreements with return countries...............was already in Labours manifesto and Labour are working on it

Farage has no original thought

 

[denso13]

Farages plan to negotiate agreements with return countries

He is going to force the Taliban and Iranian regime if the refuse though. Tariffs?

 

[MNW67]

Farages plan to negotiate agreements with return countries...............was already in Labours manifesto and Labour are working on it

Farage has no original thought

Farage's original thought is to return everyone, including those who will be tortured and/or executed. Labour only want to return failed asylum seekers.

 

[Odds]

until we all have the same?

Not exactly.
That's a reductive pov at an extremely complex subject but i'll remind you Thatcher's Poll Tax failed because it was inherently unfair. What folk want to see is a more balanced approach, so if you can afford to pay, then you should do so.

 

[MNW67]

until we all have the same?

No

 

[MNW67]

So, returning to my hypothetical example which got hijacked yesterday.

There is very little inherent legal protection for our rights in this country. If we opt out of the ECHR etc. then Parliament can do whatever it wants. There is no overarching domestic protection.

So, to take an extreme example to highlight the principle. If a government wanted to bring in a law making torture legal, there is nothing to stop them. First they would need to pass the law through the House of Commons. If they didn't have enough votes in the House of Lords, they could use the Parliament Act. That would mean the government would have to wait for 12 months before the law became legal.

Once it was passed, there would be no way for the law to be challenged in the courts.

 

[motorbiking]

Not exactly.
That's a reductive pov at an extremely complex subject but i'll remind you Thatcher's Poll Tax failed because it was inherently unfair. What folk want to see is a more balanced approach, so if you can afford to pay, then you should do so.

The one time I voted Labour. For me I was being asked to pay a tax that previously I didn't have to pay and was a student at the time.

It's funny how the government taking your money encourages you to vote them down.