As I expected, it's amazing the difference in voting that can result from a small change/clarification in the wording of a question!
So it appears, although unfortunately thus far by far the majority of the people who voted "Yes" in the original poll haven't responded to this one, which is a pity as that might be more indicative.
As it stands on my analysis of the voting at this moment (7:10 p.m. your time), of the 18 people who voted "Yes" originally, two have voted "Yes" this time around and the remaining 16 have either abstained, not yet noticed the new poll, or become fed up with the debate and decided to stay out of it. But two who did not vote originally have voted "Yes" this time.
Of the 7 "No" votes originally, 5 have also voted "No" this time (including you John, and yours truly). But we also picked up 2 more "No" votes from people who didn't vote originally.
There are 6 votes for "Only if feeding equipment ouside" in the original poll, and of those people 3 have now voted "No" in this poll, with the other 3 not having voted.