safe to go to 1 metre....or not?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes, but those numbers might be out by a factor of two, the numbers of people with positive tests at the beginning of the outbreak were probably out by a factor of 10 or more.

Or what you are saying is.... you're guessing?
 
Or what you are saying is.... you're guessing?
We know the numbers at the beginning are utterly rubbish. We can have more confidence now. Look at the % positive of each batch. If you're getting 50% then it implies you're testing far too few people. Current numbers are single % positive.
 
We know the numbers at the beginning are utterly rubbish. We can have more confidence now. Look at the % positive of each batch. If you're getting 50% then it implies you're testing far too few people. Current numbers are single % positive.

What kind of tests were performed? how accurate were they? under what circumstances were people tested? a test only confirms at a fixed point in time the number infected.... etc etc etc.
 
Or number 3

That the current virus is merely a more virulent form of flu.

What you have to look at is recorded deaths above the seasonal average, and many countries are not seeing a significant increase.

So number 4 is the quality of healthcare available.

And number 5 is the quality of leadership.

The UK is certainly failing in that last one!
You know what to do then. (y)
 
According to him, he has the answer for him and his family but seems reluctant at the very least to put his master plan into action. Prefers to stay, pick, niggle and complain.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top