Yes, but those numbers might be out by a factor of two, the numbers of people with positive tests at the beginning of the outbreak were probably out by a factor of 10 or more.
We know the numbers at the beginning are utterly rubbish. We can have more confidence now. Look at the % positive of each batch. If you're getting 50% then it implies you're testing far too few people. Current numbers are single % positive.
We know the numbers at the beginning are utterly rubbish. We can have more confidence now. Look at the % positive of each batch. If you're getting 50% then it implies you're testing far too few people. Current numbers are single % positive.
What kind of tests were performed? how accurate were they? under what circumstances were people tested? a test only confirms at a fixed point in time the number infected.... etc etc etc.
According to him, he has the answer for him and his family but seems reluctant at the very least to put his master plan into action. Prefers to stay, pick, niggle and complain.