And Hue Edwards and they put a helicopter over an innocent mans house .. now they have been caught with there pants down people still believe them talk about a classic sign of confirmation bias ..
-
Looking for a smarter way to manage your heating this winter? We’ve been testing the new Aqara Radiator Thermostat W600 to see how quiet, accurate and easy it is to use around the home. Click here read our review.
Shows how untrustworthy the BBC are
- Thread starter Koolpc
- Start date
- Status
He is a Master 7th Degree Black Belt in the Korean martial art of Taekwon-Do and 6th Degree POLARM Close-Quarters Combat Skills. He teaches local clubs voluntarily and on specialist combat courses for the British Army and Special Forces. He also has a First-class Honours Bachelor of Laws, Distinction Master of Laws in Legal Practice (Barristers), and Distinction Bar Professional Training Course (BTPC). He now practises from his own firm and has 850,000 followers on YouTube... Yes what a complete failure and loser he is lol
Last edited:
Very good.
From now on then, solely use Orangina's utterings, and Truth Social as your trusted sources.
If it's that good, it'll be fine for work purposes as well.
Remember to cite it too: just so everyone - stakeholders including - can rest easy that your decisions and opinions are founded on solid ground.
Go on, I DARE you
so, you have a chip on both shoulders?
The resignations of the BBC’s director general and its head of news over claims of bias were “a coup” orchestrated from the inside, David Yelland, who edited the Sun from 1998 to 2003, told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme on Monday that the departures of Tim Davie and Deborah Turness followed the systematic undermining of them by people close to the BBC board over a lengthy period.
A Right Wang hatchet job.
Figures.
A Right Wang hatchet job.
Figures.
you obviously watch GBnews
I guarantee you:
1) voted for Brexit
2) think man made climate change is a myth
3) support Reform
4) voted for Boris Johnson
5) are an anti vaxxer (in terms of covid)
6) Trump supporter
7) think it is a waste of money helping Ukraine
Its a Venn diagram of the people Trump loves
yes the implication is clear..........you are taking one small phrase out of context to the speech overall which was a stream of inflammatory rhetoric
"By focusing on that brief phrase, Trump is trying to deceive both the courts and the public. He wants people to focus on a short passage in which he told his supporters to march “peacefully and patriotically” to the Capitol, while ignoring all the inflammatory rhetoric he employed during the same speech."
Assessing the Full Record
The full weight of the evidence – first collected by the January 6th Select Committee and now Special Counsel Jack Smith’s office – tells a very different story. And it is a damning one for Trump’s defense. Indeed, the record includes strong evidence that Trump supported the use of violence on Jan. 6 and tried to use it to his political advantage to block the certification of the election.
Dissecting Trump’s “Peacefully and Patriotically” Defense of the January 6th Attack
An analysis of former President Trump's reference to "peacefully and patriotically" in his January 6th Ellipse speech - for the trial and court of public opinion.
www.justsecurity.org
the BBC was right -he did incite violence
The American Senate deemed the matter worthy of Impeachement - his second impeachment.
Nobody has more impeachments than Donald. He's the bigliest in history at it.
From the BBC website:
The article of impeachment stated that Mr Trump "repeatedly issued false statements asserting that the presidential election results were fraudulent and should not be accepted". It says he then repeated these claims and "wilfully made statements to the crowd that encouraged and foreseeably resulted in lawless action at the Capitol", leading to the violence and loss of life.
"President Trump gravely endangered the security of the United States and its institutions of government, threatened the integrity of the democratic system, interfered with the peaceful transition of power, and imperilled a coequal branch of government."
Nobody has more impeachments than Donald. He's the bigliest in history at it.
From the BBC website:
The article of impeachment stated that Mr Trump "repeatedly issued false statements asserting that the presidential election results were fraudulent and should not be accepted". It says he then repeated these claims and "wilfully made statements to the crowd that encouraged and foreseeably resulted in lawless action at the Capitol", leading to the violence and loss of life.
"President Trump gravely endangered the security of the United States and its institutions of government, threatened the integrity of the democratic system, interfered with the peaceful transition of power, and imperilled a coequal branch of government."
those on here moaning about the BBC being untrustworthy arent bothered about Trumps denial of the election result
I don't think it is.
GB news bulletins are factual, it's the discussion points and shows that the GB news haters don't like because they take a more right wing approach than the BBC and then presenters have a right wing bias.
That being said, GB news actively invites both right AND left wing representatives onto their programmes and allow both sides of the argument to be discussed, even when the discussion gets heated. Even the labour party have acknowledged that they need to interact with GB news and send MP or active labour party members onto the GB news programmes.
The left don't like GB news because the left don't welcome discussion of opposing views, think that their view is always the correct view and that right wing views are automatically wrong or 'extremist'. That is why the BBC is in trouble, because they can't or won't acknowledge that the BBC is culturally left wing.
This Trump video editing is a case in point. The BBC cannot accept that they've done anything wrong with the editing. In their minds they believe that they edited trumps speech to show what they think Trump was trying to say, rather than what he actually said. In their minds, Trump is a bad man, so all the media they produce from that point onwards is inevitably tainted with that slant.
Same with Brexit, trans rights, immigration etc etc.
Unconnected points. Whether Trump denied the election result or not, the BBC should not have edited his speech to make it appear he said something he didn't say.
Two wrongs don't make a right, and its the BBC's job to report the facts, not present their interpretation of the facts.
I read that list with interest as i do watch GB news
1. I voted remain, but regret it.
2. I believe the climate is changing, i believe that are we are certainly influencing the climate, and i believe that we shouldn't be so wasteful with our resources. But i am not convinced that our actions can stop the climate from changing.
3. Starting to possibly consider supporting reform. Mainly because they seem to be more conservative than the conservatives.
4. i did vote for Boris and sincerely regret it. He was terrible for the country in so many ways.
5. definitely not an anti vaxer. But with hindsight, i'm firmly anti lockdown.
6. Not a trump supporter by any stretch of the imagination. But i agree with some of what he says and does.
7. I'm a firm believer in supporting Ukraine.
So, all in all, you made a reasonable assessment of a GB news viewer
They've been more than vocal in support of his Fascist policies and racist views.
- Status
Similar threads
- Deleted member 294929
- General Discussion
