- Joined
- 25 Jul 2022
- Messages
- 17,924
- Reaction score
- 1,502
- Country

Oh of courseBefore he said it.

Oh of courseBefore he said it.

Why isn’t he in prison.Yes
He did 1. And not the other .
He might have had some defence if he'd called for it to stop

How has he been defamed ?It good to see the forum numpties think that someone with a poor reputation cannot suffer defamation. Of course it’s nonsense.

Is that your real answer ?Why isn’t he in prison.
Is it because he didn’t.

I’ve already stated that his claim for defamation is out of time unless he can prove malicious intent. In the U.K.How has he been defamed ?
There was an editorial edit, but the overall gist was right. Or are you saying different ?
The big boys lawyers don't seem too concerned.
Yeah, four dead cops and a 'protestor'.You've got to laugh.

The bbc lawyers see it differently to you don't forget.I’ve already stated that his claim for defamation is out of time unless he can prove malicious intend.
This of course does not change the facts of the broadcast and its impact.

In fact they don’t. They have been very careful to avoid anything that supports the malicious element.The bbc lawyers see it differently to you don't forget.
I think they are proper lawyers

I will let them fight the case.In fact they don’t. They have been very careful to avoid anything that supports the malicious element.

I will let them fight the case.
They seem to know what they are doing.

Oh, so you are going on about nothing ?What case?

The BBC did not change the quote. They edited the timeline.You are not allowed to change peoples quotes on here. Why? Well, imagine the impact of what the BBC did!!!!