Shows how untrustworthy the BBC are

Status
Not open for further replies.
It good to see the forum numpties think that someone with a poor reputation cannot suffer defamation. Of course it’s nonsense.
How has he been defamed ?

There was an editorial edit, but the overall gist was right. Or are you saying different ?

The big boys lawyers don't seem too concerned.
 
How has he been defamed ?

There was an editorial edit, but the overall gist was right. Or are you saying different ?

The big boys lawyers don't seem too concerned.
I’ve already stated that his claim for defamation is out of time unless he can prove malicious intent. In the U.K.

This of course does not change the facts of the broadcast and its impact.

The overall gist was in fact very wrong.
 
I’ve already stated that his claim for defamation is out of time unless he can prove malicious intend.

This of course does not change the facts of the broadcast and its impact.
The bbc lawyers see it differently to you don't forget.

I think they are proper lawyers
 
You are not allowed to change peoples quotes on here. Why? Well, imagine the impact of what the BBC did!!!!
 
Is this going to be another thread of pages and pages of you saying nothing but twisting to say you didn't say that originally anyway?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top