logical fallacySo the Palestinians starving and being bombed are all now saved through her?
no wonder Motorbiking liked your post, he loves logical fallacies, every post of his contains several
logical fallacySo the Palestinians starving and being bombed are all now saved through her?

You are not a model poster yourself and I prefer to take notice of what MBK posts rather than your terrible opinionated rubbish.logical fallacy
no wonder Motorbiking liked your post, he loves logical fallacies, every post of his contains several
I cant answer because your question is based on a falsehoodOdd that you won’t answer.
Your alternative is wrong of course.

So they don’t have the ability to prevent a vessel whose passage is not innocent from entering their territorial waters.I cant answer because your question is based on a falsehood
I repeat:
You’ve stated that the "act of a state protecting it’s territorial waters from non innocent passage as per their rights under article 25"
until the boat enters into British waters, "non innocent passage" is not happening
so you are WRONG
That doesn’t look like you’re ignoring anything to me.I shall ignore your whataboutery word salad and state this:
a British boat entering French water to carry out pushbacks on migrant boats is not an act of innocent passage
So they don’t have the ability to prevent a vessel whose passage is not innocent from entering their territorial waters.
This is your position?
MBK liesYou are not a model poster yourself and I prefer to take notice of what MBK posts rather than your terrible opinionated rubbish.
It is noted Motorbiking hasnt answered this yet.Please show me on this image where the border between France and British territorial waters runs
![]()
Mottie won’t say why he supports Reform

Don't be silly.So the Palestinians starving and being bombed are all now saved through her?
logical fallacy

NoPolitical will. It’s not a legal matter it’s a political one.
It’s a diplomatic issue.Political will. It’s not a legal matter it’s a political one.