D
Deleted member 323070
Correcting your misinterpretations is not 'being wrong' .keep being wrong then.
If someone has the intention to do something, it's reasonable to describe them ss though they have acted as they intended.They are not asylum seekers until they claim asylum.
They don't have any fast attack military style boats.You clearly know nothing of the tools they have. Radar, Drones and plenty of small craft. If you look at the video they were using adapted Jetskis. £10k a pop.
Nobody has suggested a borderforce cutter. There are plenty of suitable vessels. An Axopar 37 would easily do the job. £250k But I suspect they have plenty of options.
They don't have unlimited access to as many boats, equipment or personnel as needed.
How many asylum seekers can a jet ski rescue?They were using jet skis. Marinaras do it daily in £5k boats.
It would be like attacking a cow with flies buzzing round.
I prefer to wait for the official data rather than your presentation of RWR origins.Nonsense - I've provided links.
Only for "non innocent" vessels.Article 25 allows any necessary means.
May I remind you of what you just said:
keep being wrong then.
For as long as you continue to present your misinterpreted version of regulations, i will continue to correct you.TomWW said:Correcting your misinterpretations is not 'being wrong' .
Presenting the recognised international interpretation of the regulations is not hop, skipping and jumping about.now you are hop skip and jumping around as you call it.
It did not include details.The data has been posted - it was a terrible tool for the UK.
Knowing your penchant for presentation and misinterpretation of data., I wouldn't be surprised if you misrepresented that data.
Show us the details of those returned from UK to other countries.
