I can but presume that the implication of what he said was that one undertakes risk assessments, undertakes what remedial or other work may be indicated by those assessments and then provide the tenant with documentation of the risk assessment and any actions taken as a result of it. It would obviously make no sense to do as you suggest and document a risk assessment which had identified things that needed intention but do nothing about those required actions!I'm also puzzled about this. Are you saying that you can give tenants a list of potential risks - e.g. shower faulty, electric shock from oven if you touch it, juliet balcony held up with duct tape - rather than rectify any faults, then it's ok?
However, as others have said, I don't understand the suggestion that provision of such documentation is a pre-requisite of "being able to get the tenants out". That sounds extremely unlikely.
As for the risk assessment in relation to Legionella (if it is needed/done), I'm not sure that it would be adequate to just observe that the DHW was regularly brought to above 60°C. Is not the greater potential risk (in the presence of sources of possible atomisation, like the jacuzzis and pumped showers I mentioned) any stored cold water that could be involved?
Kind Regards, John