This ethnic cleansing

[transam]

In Burma (if that is the correct term)

over 200,000 muslims (?) forced out into Bangladesh , one of the poorest countries in the world

By the burmese government headed by a nobel peace prize winner , who seems to be in some type of denial about whats going on , or she does not give a s*** ???

strip her of the nobel award for a start , seize the countries over seas assets in order to pay for the chaos they are creating

 

[Lmfao]

Just for interest....have you personally researched, independent of the 'so called news' you consume, the reason why?

Have you first hand knowledge of the portrayed situation?

Why do you think that a country would wish to expel a particular minority?

 

[Roger928]

Burma is mostly buddihist and they probably don't want a dangerous race of people inside their borders.

 

[transam]

Just for interest....have you personally researched, independent of the 'so called news' you consume, the reason why?

Have you first hand knowledge of the portrayed situation?

Why do you think that a country would wish to expel a particular minority?

Burma is run by a vile military dictatorship . Still is although they are taken a public back seat

The woman who heads the civilian government is supposedly a champion of human rights. UN have designated this caper as ethnic cleansing.

 

[SirGalahad]

Burma is mostly buddihist and they probably don't want a dangerous race of people inside their borders.

What Race is that?

 

[transam]

they (Burmese) refer to them as Bengali's ?

 

[Ian H]

Probably the Human race.

 

[Doggit]

This ones tricky by any stretch of the imagination. Myanmar (formerly Burma) is supposed to be a muti religion state, but the government seem to favour the majority budhist religion.

The rohingya muslims seem to be an outcast in both Myanmar, where they are considered Bengalis, and in Bengladesh, where they are considered as Burmese. They are reckoned to be the most persecuted people in the world, and Aung San suu Kyi appears to have washed her hands of them.

 

[transam]

It would seem that this policy of getting rid of the rohingya has support amongst the Burmese / budhists (going by what was said on news night last night)

They (Burma) do not want them back ?

way I see it u cannot have some country deliberately kicking out thousands of people & dumping the problem on other countries or the international community

 

[Doggit]

I agree Transam, but that what ethnic cleansing is all about, and it's odd how they continue to get away with it. The international community all stand up and condemn them, then sit down and carry on nattering amongst themselves.

 

[^woody^]

If only they could make it to Germany. Then it's rainbows and unicorns.

 

[Brigadier]

If only they could make it to Germany. Then it's rainbows and unicorns.

I was thinking a similar thing, although there is the strange paradox that, in Europe, they will be both protected and eradicated at the same time.

 

[Doggit]

If only they could make it to Germany. Then it's rainbows and unicorns.

Except German and France now want to suspend the Schengen Agreement, and re-reintroduce border controls, so how are they going to get there. Yet at the same time, Junkers wants to extend it to include Bulgaria Romania and Croatia. So it look like Merkel has encourages all these "refugees" to come to Germany, and then told them they've got to stay in the first country they come to. Shame that France seems happy to let all the Calais Migrants to sit there trying to get into the UK, instead of processing them there.

 

[IWalkLikeHimaMartian]

Except German and France now want to suspend the Schengen Agreement, and re-reintroduce border controls,

Oh dear, doggit is twisting the truth again. Maybe him and **** end are in competition to see who can twist the truth the most.
He forgot to add that they want the right to extend the suspension of the Schengen Agreement temporarily, which is the freedom of movement without border control.
Freedom of movement will still be applicable, it is just that border controls will be temporarily introduced.

the EU’s two biggest countries are pushing for the Schengen zone to be suspended in “exceptional circumstances”, making all travellers subject to border checks as they enter a country.

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/...one-over-terror-and-migration-fears-3v6v3vnqf

There has already been some changes made:

In December, the European Commission proposed a major amendment to Schengen, expected to become law soon. Most non-EU travellers have their details checked against police databases at the EU's external borders. The main change is that the rule will apply to EU citizens as well, who until now had been exempt.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-13194723

Any member state already had the right to suspend the Schengen Agreement, for up to two years. So this current consideration is a minor tweak, not some major change that doggit is trying to make out.

Under the Schengen rules, signatories may reinstate internal border controls for 10 days, if this has to be done immediately for "public policy or national security" reasons.
If the problem continues, the controls can be maintained for "renewable periods" of up to 20 days and for a maximum of two months.
The period is longer in cases where the threat is considered "foreseeable". The controls can be maintained for renewable periods of up to 30 days, and for a maximum of six months.
An extension of two years maximum is allowed under Article 26 of the Schengen Borders Code, in "exceptional circumstances".

 

[^woody^]

Spain is the new Germany, apparently.