so hawkey posts a vid which annoys him, but can't actually find anything in it to complain about.
What a waste of electrons.
this is why labour are ****** at the moment
- Thread starter HawkEye244
- Start date
so hawkey posts a vid which annoys him, but can't actually find anything in it to complain about.
What a waste of electrons.
- Joined
- 1 Apr 2016
- Messages
- 13,606
- Reaction score
- 550
- Country
The only one rambling is yourself. Do I have to shout to make myself clear. I agree with the sex you are born as and then if you so wish you can call yourself some other gender which funnily enough is your viewpoint. By the way some people are born with ambiguous genitalia or can be referred to as being intersex.
I strongly disagree with people being able to change their sex at birth. If you want to change your sex after birth then you can do so if its medically required but you can then add the specification of gender as an amendment to the birth certificate.
No that's not my viewpoint. Your MP is in favour of people being able to determine their own sex, I'm against that.
The whole video is a waste of tax payer money.
- Joined
- 1 Apr 2016
- Messages
- 13,606
- Reaction score
- 550
- Country
- Joined
- 1 Apr 2016
- Messages
- 13,606
- Reaction score
- 550
- Country
Can you tell me where the Government has spent wisely then. Which areas of spending do yo agree with.
So Im guessing you think this was money well spent:
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/...rneutral-toilets-spark-backlash-a3629831.html
Notch how did you get the exact opposite out of what I said?
be kinder to yourself.
I was agreeing with you...........I just omitted the (NOT!) at the end of the sentence
On a serious note though, those people that have gender issues, really do live a difficult traumatic life trapped in the wrong physical body. That is something which should be recognized by the wider public.
However that doesnt mean the ultra PC brigade have to go over board making every single UK toilet gender neutral. And as for parents that choose to bring their children up a gender neutral, no, totally disagree with that.
and do you foresee anybody doing that?
Another straw man argument from grumbling old notch
Has anyone thought about this?
The only difference in a "gender neutral"(stupid term) public toilet is, presumably, that it doesn't have urinals.
Well, I'm all for that; I don't want to stand next to several other men, who are invariably fatter than I am, while having a pιss.
Apart from that the objection to transgender people using public toilets is a perceived fear by women that people with penises will be using the ladies and this will encourage perverts to dress as women so that they might do the same without sanction.
It is therefore not really a consideration of transgender people that these toilets should be built but supposed fear of the consequences if they are not.
I suppose no man has ever feared that the other person in the toilets is actually a woman dressed as a man.
The only answer is separate individual toilets.
The only difference in a "gender neutral"(stupid term) public toilet is, presumably, that it doesn't have urinals.
Well, I'm all for that; I don't want to stand next to several other men, who are invariably fatter than I am, while having a pιss.
Apart from that the objection to transgender people using public toilets is a perceived fear by women that people with penises will be using the ladies and this will encourage perverts to dress as women so that they might do the same without sanction.
It is therefore not really a consideration of transgender people that these toilets should be built but supposed fear of the consequences if they are not.
I suppose no man has ever feared that the other person in the toilets is actually a woman dressed as a man.
The only answer is separate individual toilets.
