Totally predictable: Trump discusses giving land to Russia

That is the full problem with going to war with Russia, NATO has a lot of superior weapons, better equipped army and navy and air force. Russia unfortunately has what terrifies everyone, Nuclear weapons and it would use them.
He doesnt have to fire a Nuclear weapon into the UK, he would just drop a couple into the North sea, cause a sunami and wipe the UK. out. All without striking us with a direct hit
 
Thank you for correcting gas112s claim Russia is a top economy.....its not even in the top 10 :ROFLMAO:
just under 200 countries in the world and russia is in the top 6 % so yep one of the top economies in the world . I know maths isnt your strong point
 
That is the full problem with going to war with Russia, NATO has a lot of superior weapons, better equipped army and navy and air force. Russia unfortunately has what terrifies everyone, Nuclear weapons and it would use them.
3 years of Ukraine war, the West have supplied more and more weapons despite Putins repeated threats of nuclear.

It's an empty threat, Putin instantly risks massive retaliation if he uses one.
 
3 years of Ukraine war, the West have supplied more and more weapons despite Putins repeated threats of nuclear.

It's an empty threat, Putin instantly risks massive retaliation if he uses one.
I wouldnt push him into a corner, he is winning in Ukraine he doesnt need nuclear weapons, and the only nuclear weapon he has threatened is a tactical nuke. It worked too and why we havent supplied Zelenski with the missiles to strike Moscow
 
We have supplied weapons and ammo for ukraine to hold him back, not to win him
 
He doesnt have to fire a Nuclear weapon into the UK, he would just drop a couple into the North sea, cause a sunami and wipe the UK. out. All without striking us with a direct hit
Who told you that

A nuclear bomb in the sea is tiny compared to a natural tsunami

A physicist says blowing up nuclear weapons in the ocean to trigger tsunamis 'would be completely stupid' https://share.google/EmVpbTHQu2dyl9Qjc
 
We have supplied weapons and ammo for ukraine to hold him back, not to win him
Yes, that's a massive failure by the West

Had we provided all the stuff at the beginning Russia would've been kicked out in 2022

Obviously gas112 who still thinks the Russian Empire exists believes otherwise :ROFLMAO:
 
Yes, that's a massive failure by the West

Had we provided all the stuff at the beginning Russia would've been kicked out in 2022

Obviously gas112 who still thinks the Russian Empire exists believes otherwise :ROFLMAO:
I wouldn't say a massive failure, more cautious, also it has revealed and tested a fair amount of weaponary for us.
 
If NATO do go to war then boots on the ground will only come after the air forces have done their job, if at all. There won't be any fighting in Ukraine.
Great so the army could work from home and wait for a call from the airforce. You should join up.
 
Great so the army could work from home and wait for a call from the airforce.
It's the US have done on all recent wars/invasions. They take out a lot of strategic targets from the air first, I'm sure you know that.
 
I wouldn't say a massive failure, more cautious, also it has revealed and tested a fair amount of weaponary for us.
I think its a massive failure, the West stood back and let Putin take Crimea back in 2014, I took an interest because I was doing a lot of work for a Conservative MP at the time and he was frequently having to rush off to London muttering about Ukraine
 
It's the US have done on all recent wars/invasions. They take out a lot of strategic targets from the air first, I'm sure you know that.
yes I think I know the drill, no need for an army, just send in the airforce and leave it to them. Sounds a good deal.
 
Just wondering though, what is the point of tanks and APC's and the such when you have air superiority?
 
Back
Top