- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 14,564
- Reaction score
- 2,176
- Country
The comparison doesn’t really mean much unless you take account of km/person. It stands to reason that countries more densely populated have to make more efficient use of land.
Since the Netherlands has almost twice the population density we have and much larger properties, it seems a weak link.The comparison doesn’t really mean much unless you take account of km/person. It stands to reason that countries more densely populated have to make more efficient use of land.
only 5.9% of the UK is built onThe comparison doesn’t really mean much unless you take account of km/person. It stands to reason that countries more densely populated have to make more efficient use of land.
generate income from it and never sell any of it.
Indeed. Also, I wonder how the the figure would look for the UK if you excluded London (and even the crazy areas of Leeds and Manchester with expensive apartments)? They seem rather good at squeezing ever more tiny houses into gaps there.Since the Netherlands has almost twice the population density we have and much larger properties, it seems a weak link.
It helps when you are able to avoid inheritance tax!50% of UK land owned by 1% of population
eg:
Hugh Grosvenor, 7th Duke of Westminster: 140,000 acres
he isnt doing badly for a 29 year old
for the land owner.
So, 51% to the locals, 49% to the landlord?And the farmer benefits.
You seem to think that with these land owning lords its all take take take.
A local estate of 2500 acres and owned by his lordship Lord .......... employs 10 people.
Including my brother.
It generates an income of about £2 million per year. Most of which goes back into the local community.
So, as to what started this, do you think his Lordship is a farmer?And the farmer benefits.
You seem to think that with these land owning lords its all take take take.
A local estate of 2500 acres and owned by his lordship Lord .......... employs 10 people.
Including my brother.
It generates an income of about £2 million per year. Most of which goes back into the local community.
How much more would the employees and community benefit if his Lordship did not 'own' the land?