Ukraine's incredible new £1.2bn resort

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 317777
  • Start date Start date
It's become apparent US government agencies have been using taxpayer dollars to fund all manner of shady and egregious schemes all over the world.
I disagree, so don't come to the same conclusion as you.
 
Bet there is a shed load unacounted for

This is a misunderstanding promoted by people like Steve Bannon. Ukraine can account for all the money the have received directly, which I think is about $80bn. But most of the aid has been spent by the donor countries on behalf of Ukraine. And obviously Ukraine are unable to say what this has been spent on, because they have no control over it.
 
This is a misunderstanding promoted by people like Steve Bannon. Ukraine can account for all the money the have received directly, which I think is about $80bn. But most of the aid has been spent by the donor countries on behalf of Ukraine. And obviously Ukraine are unable to say what this has been spent on, because they have no control over it.
A few Ferrari and the odd Lamborghini will probably come to light.
 
A few Ferrari and the odd Lamborghini will probably come to light.

That might very well turn out in the end to be true.

But that is not the point the Steven Bannons of this world are making.

Zelensky has said that he can only account for the money Ukraine has received directly from the USA, which he says is $80bn. The MAGA propagandists are distorting this statement to accuse him of corruption.
 
So you admit Ukraine's war is not really about Ukraine vs Russia, but the West vs Russia. Glad we got there in the end.
I was reflecting your assertion that a reason for the uk not continuing to support ukrane was the effect it allegedly has on our pensions. Before that you said it was because you were concerned about ukraneian deaths. It is in fact about defending a country's sovereignty from an aggressor who will not stop with this invasion.
 
That might very well turn out in the end to be true.

But that is not the point the Steven Bannons of this world are making.

Zelensky has said that he can only account for the money Ukraine has received directly from the USA, which he says is $80bn. The MAGA propagandists are distorting this statement to accuse him of corruption.
Who are the MAGA propagandists in this context?
 
I was reflecting your assertion that a reason for the uk not continuing to support ukrane was the effect it allegedly has on our pensions. Before that you said it was because you were concerned about ukraneian deaths. It is in fact about defending a country's sovereignty from an aggressor who will not stop with this invasion.
Our coffers are in a terrible state. This is a fact. We don't have enough money for everything. This is a fact.
 
Sorry but I am going to drill down on 'etc'. Who are you talking about?

Several MAGA Republican I have read quoted in the NYT or seen on Youtube. I can't remember their names. But it is a common talking point in MAGA world that Ukraine have been given $350bn but can only account for $80bn of it.

But you were the one who claimed in the first place that much of the aid was unaccounted for. Where did you get that information?
 
Last edited:
Several MAGA Republican I have read quoted in the NYT or seen on Youtube. I can't remember their names. But it is a common talking point in MAGA world that Ukraine have been given $350bn but can only account for $80bn of it.

But you were the one who claimed in the first place that much of the aid was unaccounted for. Where did you get that information?
This one? My quote from the Trump v Zelensky thread:
Listened to a podcast today with Congresswoman Harriet Hageman who said on it, that Ukraine could not account for all the money the US had given to them. She said the US have given Ukraine $200 billion dollars and Zelensky can only account for $80 billion of that, citing they do not know where the rest of the funds went. She also said the US had gone much further than just funding Ukraine's defence but was also funding their schools and paying for Ukranians garbage collection.
Interview with Congresswoman Harriet Hageman on The Winston Marshall Show Podcast 'Why Democrats are silent on USAid Fraud, Censorship and Human Trafficking'.
 
Our coffers are in a terrible state. This is a fact. We don't have enough money for everything. This is a fact.
That sounds like Maggie, when her policies massively increased personal borrowing
 
This one? My quote from the Trump v Zelensky thread:

Interview with Congresswoman Harriet Hageman on The Winston Marshall Show Podcast 'Why Democrats are silent on USAid Fraud, Censorship and Human Trafficking'.

Thanks. So, that's another MAGA person who is making these claims. As I say, it is a common talking point. Why were you hassling me to name them when you knew all along?
 
Thanks. So, that's another MAGA person who is making these claims. As I say, it is a common talking point. Why were you hassling me to name them when you knew all along?
Is she MAGA? I wasn't hassling you, it was a legitimate question, to which I didn't know the answer. Crumbs.
 
Back
Top