Maybe - who knows what they think, know, or think they know?! In terms of possible faults arising within the equipment itself (possibly in conjunction with other faults), it is surely 'safer' ('belts and braces') for it to be double insulated and to have an earthed outer metallic case, rather than to have just one of those protective measures? The downsides of earthing that case (if it's Class II) are all about the safety of the environment in general. Of course, if it's Class I, one has no choice but to earth the case, and the 'reduced safety of the environment' is then unavoidable (but clearly not regarded as 'unacceptable', since it is required!).Perhaps they know it is safer not to earth it otherwise there is no point going to the trouble of making it Class II.
As Simon has said, I suspect that the real truth is that what we are seeing is probably a perpetuation of a practice which was initially based upon a misunderstanding of the regulatory requirements. The same quite probably goes for "3-pole isolators" and 3A fuses for extractor fans.
If I have a moment with nothing better to so, I might try asking some of these manufacturers, but, if I do, I will not be holding my breath for sensible/useful answers!
Kind Regards, John
