agreedAny posts by gassafeman. What an idiot, and he has (apparently) many guise's.
Paul.
agreedAny posts by gassafeman. What an idiot, and he has (apparently) many guise's.
Paul.
Pointing out spelling mistakes, bad grammar, or other items which have nothing to do with topic but then not help the original poster.
Also telling people they can't do things instead of saying how and why.
For example "You can't do that because of Part P" rather than "Because of Part P it may be cheaper not to DIY". Then explain or don't bother posting a reply.
Or "You should not do that it's dangerous" you know the poster will take no notice so why not explain why it's dangerous or not post a reply?
Just wondering, how do you know they are hairy?Big hairy blokes with female names ( conny and libbylou lou for example)
Perhaps their hemaphridites!
Cheerspeople coming out with daft comments during a post to get useful info... (sorry Tim, but you are the biggest culprit!! - although i'd still buy you a beer!)
Sorry Tim, but you are the biggest culprit!! - although i'd still buy you a beer!)
Depends which way it was going on the conveyor belt..........only kidding.not being able to discuss how a plane would act if it were on a conveyor belt that went as fast as the plane wheels... would it take off?
Depends which way it was going on the conveyor belt..........only kidding.
The conveyor belt would surely have no effect 'cos the plane's thrust is against the air, not via driven wheels on the conveyor belt. Therefore the belt/wheels equillibrium is a physical impossibility. Unless at a standstill. init?
Depends which way it was going on the conveyor belt..........only kidding.not being able to discuss how a plane would act if it were on a conveyor belt that went as fast as the plane wheels... would it take off?
The conveyor belt would surely have no effect 'cos the plane's thrust is against the air, not via driven wheels on the conveyor belt. Therefore the belt/wheels equillibrium is a physical impossibility. Unless at a standstill. init?