thats certainly a good pointYes temporarily due to the wave caused
I guess since a aqueduct is quite narrow with not much space either side a wave will get pushed forward, so the water volume in front of the barge will increase.

thats certainly a good pointYes temporarily due to the wave caused
the displaced water went over the top of the bucket,

Sticking to the exam question its a moving barge in a canal - the canal is quite narrow and the water will rise as the barge passes through. So the answer to the question is Yes. Depending on the speed.Except, of course, that the displacement of the barge moves away an equal weight of water, so the answer is no.
"Displacing water locally" raises the water level by a tiny amount over the entire canal. It might be enough to discern by precision measurement close to the vessel, but the boat does not have a footprint of increased pressure under it. Divers are not crushed every time a ship passes above.

and to the sides. Google "Froude numbers"thats certainly a good point
I guess since a aqueduct is quite narrow with not much space either side a wave will get pushed forward, so the water volume in front of the barge will increase.
Most viaducts have a footpath built over the water that allows displaced water to flow back past the barge.Sticking to the exam question its a moving barge in a canal - the canal is quite narrow and the water will rise as the barge passes through. So the answer to the question is Yes. Depending on the speed.

Absolute rubbish. I was the only one with any credibility to answer this questiion. Everybody just followed my answers. Muppetts.Indeed, you were the first person to correctly identify the vital bit: where the water goes.

Exactly what I had said.Except, of course, that the displacement of the barge moves away an equal weight of water, so the answer is no.
"Displacing water locally" raises the water level by a tiny amount over the entire canal. It might be enough to discern by precision measurement close to the vessel, but the boat does not have a footprint of increased pressure under it. Divers are not crushed every time a ship passes above.

So based on the Barge moving and the Canal being reasonably snug. Are you a Yes or No to the exam question?Exactly what I had said.

NO would be my answer. I am not a physicist by any means, but based on what I have been taught that is my understanding.So based on the Barge moving and the Canal being reasonably snug. Are you a Yes or No to the exam question?

But pressure does not neccessarily equate to weight? The deeper you go under water the pressure increases but the weight of the water remains static.Sticking to the exam question its a moving barge in a canal - the canal is quite narrow and the water will rise as the barge passes through. So the answer to the question is Yes. Depending on the speed.
In the open water of course the impact of the ship, over a trillion tonnes of water, will be tiny. We do know that large waves increase the water pressure. The fact that the increase is small, does not change the physics.

by volume yes, but the wave is itself additional water. The mass of the water and therefore the pressure at the bottom is based on the the volume of the water above. The deeper you go in the water the less it makes a difference.But pressure does not neccessarily equate to weight? The deeper you go under water the pressure increases but the weight of the water remains static.


What do you think?I'm also wondering whether the stability of the structure is affected if a lot of vessels are stationary on the aqueduct?