- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 28,577
- Reaction score
- 7,500
- Country
bet he did.
Who was our 'best' Prime Minister?
- Thread starter diy_fun_uk
- Start date
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 28,577
- Reaction score
- 7,500
- Country
nothing wrong with the idea as it was back then.
Just a bunch of countries making trade easy. None of the free movement daftness.
I believe they may have mentioned how dreadful the Torys were.
Can't argue about Liz Truss, but Johnson was forcing through Brexit on the promise of regaining sovereignty and controlling borders. Yet he allowed 3.8 million immigrants in legally. Thus exacerbating the massive problems we have today. Not sure how anyone on the right wing of politics can forgive this.
Not yet he isn’t.
And yet since free movement ended, here you RWRs are, moaning like feck about the low quality of dark skinned religious types, filling the vacuum left by abandoning free movement.
You Brexers reap what you sow.
‘Utter stoopidity’ does not even come close. “Take back control”
Last edited:
- Joined
- 10 Aug 2025
- Messages
- 3,086
- Reaction score
- 2,976
- Country
Lord Salisbury.
From the days when British rulers actually acted in the interests of Britain and sought to expand its influence and territory; and long before communism took a hold. Making the rich richer makes everybody richer.
From the days when British rulers actually acted in the interests of Britain and sought to expand its influence and territory; and long before communism took a hold. Making the rich richer makes everybody richer.
What’s daft about freedom of movement as an economic expression of the free market. She signed off the Single European Act in 1986 which had free movement at its core. She was much more the pragmatic politician than people give her credit for.
Brown sold our gold at an all time low, think on…..
Blair, the war criminal did no damage ? Maybe ask in another country
Can't disagree with the Blair thing, the gold thing was foolish in hindsight, but doesn't amount to a massive loss in the overall scheme of things. He was fairly fiscally responsible otherwise.
It could be argued that Thatcher and Blair combined were a losing combination. She sold off all the houses and infrastructure, and Blair brought lots of people in to compete for what little was left.
I believe Thatcher was a foolish ideologue, but Blair was a callous Machiavellian.
- Joined
- 10 Aug 2025
- Messages
- 3,086
- Reaction score
- 2,976
- Country
We've had 30 years to see what's daft about it.
And ten years to see the insanity of not having it.
Yep.
The aftermath of Brown’s gold sell off
When the UK sold its gold at around $275 an ounce, it was close to the lowest price seen in three decades.Within just a month of the announcement, the value of Britain’s remaining gold reserves had fallen by around $650 million, dropping from $6.5 billion to $5.85 billion. At the time, critics warned the decision had already cost taxpayers more than£400 million, more than the cost of the Kosovo war.
In hindsight, the sell-off has been described as one of the most expensive financial decisions ever taken by a British chancellor, with recent estimates putting the long-term cost at around £36 billion.
Gordon Brown’s gold sale: what happened and what we learned - Gold Bank
Why did the UK sell its gold in 1999? Explore Gordon Brown’s gold sale, what happened, how gold prices later surged and the lessons for investors today.
goldbank.co.uk
