D
Deleted member 63160
That sort of talk devalues the views of people who have genuine concerns about immigration. It doesn't help your arguments either. I'm totally anti mass immigration but that sort of talk sucks mate.
Why do we need negotiators?
- Thread starter noseall
- Start date
That sort of talk devalues the views of people who have genuine concerns about immigration. It doesn't help your arguments either. I'm totally anti mass immigration but that sort of talk sucks mate.
Sponsored Links
D
Deleted member 63160
Migrants I guess.
Correct.
Try telling this to the Quitters. I guess you would need to stick your head in the sand also, to be able to tell them.
Sponsored Links
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 14,633
- Reaction score
- 2,194
- Country
for me brexit is about sovereignty, flexibility and paying in to projects where we can see benefits.
We absolutely should define our no deal position and set a review point with th EU early to determine if enough progress has been made. Time is running out to get a decent trade deal with the US.
We absolutely should define our no deal position and set a review point with th EU early to determine if enough progress has been made. Time is running out to get a decent trade deal with the US.
Er... that occurred the day they inaugurated Tump.
What, we have not benefitted from ANY EU projects?
What does this mean?
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 14,633
- Reaction score
- 2,194
- Country
right.. so here is the funny thing... No deal means all treaties end with nothing else in place. It could be chaos. but it might not be. It actually allows the UK to pick off one country, one issue at a time. So for example France, doesn't want a queue of trucks stuck at port just as much as we don't, so we say continue as is on a transition basis. The transition becomes the norm.
I really don't see a problem with everything continuing until one side or the other has a need for change. of course the EU don't want that because countries would quickly realise they were paying for nothing.
I really don't see a problem with everything continuing until one side or the other has a need for change. of course the EU don't want that because countries would quickly realise they were paying for nothing.
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 14,633
- Reaction score
- 2,194
- Country
no there have been huge benefits. but much more is spent on things that are irrelevant to the uk.
- Joined
- 25 Jan 2017
- Messages
- 4,726
- Reaction score
- 64
- Country
That is called "cherry picking" the best bits.
The negotiations are between the EU and the UK. Not France and the UK or Germany and the UK etc. Just as Merkel said to Trump when he stated that he would love a trade deal with Germany (about 10 times). She said "you can't do a trade deal with Germany, you can only do a trade deal with the EU".
You don't see a problem because you are a Quitter. You will start to see a flaw in your plan shortly though. As EFLI has said, we will end up with pretty much as what we had before, only the UK will be in a much weaker position.
Nor do those countries that are not in the EU but pay a fee that entitles them to some EU benefits.
Tell me you are not that naïve?
negotiations may seem to u that they are between the U.K and the EU , that is what the remoaners believe France & Germany run the EU club noseall
u remoaners need to wise up
On the contrary, it's the Quitters who need to get wise. We are leaving the club boyo, thanks to likes of you and all the other dumb quitters.France & Germany run the EU club noseall
u remoaners need to wise up
Sponsored Links
Similar threads
