Stephen Hawking: 'There is no heaven; it's a fairy story'

Joined
8 Jan 2011
Messages
591
Reaction score
35
Country
United Kingdom
Full article: http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2011/may/15/stephen-hawking-interview-there-is-no-heaven

A belief that heaven or an afterlife awaits us is a "fairy story" for people afraid of death, Stephen Hawking has said.

In a dismissal that underlines his firm rejection of religious comforts, Britain's most eminent scientist said there was nothing beyond the moment when the brain flickers for the final time.

Hawking, who was diagnosed with motor neurone disease at the age of 21, shares his thoughts on death, human purpose and our chance existence in an exclusive interview with the Guardian today.

The incurable illness was expected to kill Hawking within a few years of its symptoms arising, an outlook that turned the young scientist to Wagner, but ultimately led him to enjoy life more, he has said, despite the cloud hanging over his future.

"I have lived with the prospect of an early death for the last 49 years. I'm not afraid of death, but I'm in no hurry to die. I have so much I want to do first," he said.

"I regard the brain as a computer which will stop working when its components fail. There is no heaven or afterlife for broken down computers; that is a fairy story for people afraid of the dark," he added.

Hawking's latest comments go beyond those laid out in his 2010 book, The Grand Design, in which he asserted that there is no need for a creator to explain the existence of the universe. The book provoked a backlash from some religious leaders, including the chief rabbi, Lord Sacks, who accused Hawking of committing an "elementary fallacy" of logic.

The 69-year-old physicist fell seriously ill after a lecture tour in the US in 2009 and was taken to Addenbrookes hospital in an episode that sparked grave concerns for his health. He has since returned to his Cambridge department as director of research.

The physicist's remarks draw a stark line between the use of God as a metaphor and the belief in an omniscient creator whose hands guide the workings of the cosmos.

In his bestselling 1988 book, A Brief History of Time, Hawking drew on the device so beloved of Einstein, when he described what it would mean for scientists to develop a "theory of everything" – a set of equations that described every particle and force in the entire universe. "It would be the ultimate triumph of human reason – for then we should know the mind of God," he wrote.

I don't wish to enter into a debate about whether or not God is real, but why is it that whenever comments similar to his are made, religious types feel the need to condemn them with such ferocity? Are we not allowed an opinion?
 
Sponsored Links
The old bible bashers would be all out of a job and power and influence if no one believes anymore.

Think about the money & power for example that the catholic church has weilded for hundreds of years...they are not gonna give that up in a hurry are they?
 
Sponsored Links
there needs to be a religion to control people that need to be led
 
Religion is for people who are easily led, no rational thinking person could truly believe some of the things in the scriptures, it's just a way to keep people together.
You don't need to believe in god to be a good person, if you treat others as you would want them to treat you, then that should be sufficient.

Wotan
 
IF there was a god, he would have designed birds so that they cannot cr4p whilst flying. The state of my car windows some days proves beyond doubt there isn't a god.

dave
 
God is definitely female. No bloke would have designed the male form with te5ticles on the outside.
 
Full article: http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2011/may/15/stephen-hawking-interview-there-is-no-heaven

A belief that heaven or an afterlife awaits us is a "fairy story" for people afraid of death, Stephen Hawking has said.

, but why is it that whenever comments similar to his are made, religious types feel the need to condemn them with such ferocity? Are we not allowed an opinion?

Well he would say that , wouldn`t he :rolleyes: . Might be news if the Archbishop of Canterbury had said it :mrgreen:
 
EngStudent said:
-- why is it that whenever comments similar to his are made, religious types feel the need to condemn them with such ferocity?

Why indeed, when they have the ultimate, unassailable argument at their disposal? Surely a supernatural entity - call it God if you like - with the power to create a whole universe could easily hide its true origin. :cool: :cool: :cool:

And yet it is rarely heard. The only time I can remember was a line in an episode of Friends. When challenged with fossil evidence, the creationist among them replied, "So the question is, who put them there and why?" Beat that if you can. :confused: :confused: :confused:

PS: An old saying goes, "How odd of God to choose the Jews." To which I would add that, knowing human nature as he must, "How incredibly stupid to tell them!" :LOL: :LOL: :LOL:
 
God is definitely female. No bloke would have designed the male form with te5ticles on the outside.
no if theirs is a god which i do belive their is not
its a bloke as take look what woman have to go through
child birth
periods
menopause
constanly doubting their looks
 
Religion is for people who are easily led, no rational thinking person could truly believe some of the things in the scriptures, it's just a way to keep people together.

Wotan

It seems that the older people get the more willing/desperate they are to believe, especially true for the female of the species.
 
If it gives people hope and a sense of being then it cant be a bad thing.
Not for me though , I have my own beliefs so I dont need to join a club.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top