C
cantaloup63
The thing about "grassing" is that there has to be something to be "grassed".
Admin can quite easily disable an account, which requires a new email address to be set up to re-register. This process can be repeated indefinitely if needs be until something changes one way or the other.Admin should be able to look at the posters ip address and find out who it is.
Unless they are resetting their Internet connection every time they post...which is just sad.
I have no qualms about alerting the mods about a poster who provides perpetual abusive or unhelpful comments, or those which are designed to hijack threads etc. It is my hope and intention that the person concerned does reach the "set point" limit - it would be entirely his own fault for providing a sufficient number of posts that need removing.I find it sad the main culprit here uses the "alert" button incessantly and others get to a "Set count point" and are suspended..
Why is having pointless and abusive posts removed making things worse? It allow sensible banter and debate about the subject matter to continue without having to even skim read worthless comments to realise that it was well worth ignoring.Personally I can't see the point of repeatedly reporting posts .... I think it just makes the situation worse..
I agree, and non of us on here are angels, pure as the driven snow. It's the incessant and deliberate drivel, abuse and time-wasting from one poster in particular that should be eradicated.For me it's either have rules that are followed and stick by them (sure we should all be allowed to blow of steam and offer opinions that might bend the rules a little and get away with a slapped a**e)
I think the abuse should be sub-sectioned and placed a sin bin, so we all know who the picks are!Why is having pointless and abusive posts removed making things worse? It allow sensible banter and debate about the subject matter to continue without having to even skim read worthless comments to realise that it was well worth ignoring.