The McCann mystery,

[joe-90]

on 'diynot.com' as told by joe.

as i said in a previous post,will the forum admin be held accountable if they decide to get legal about certain people slagging them off ??.

theres a fine line between offering an opinion and spouting accusations.

but hey its your forum joe,you do what you want/like.

We are discussing facts. Get over it or leave the thread.

 

[Shutpa]

The establishment. They appealed to Cameron.?

I know that joe is often criticized for some of the statements he makes in his replies to threads. However, I doubt very much if anyone can quote anything from any of those replies to vie with the one quoted.

What he is saying is that the establishment, which includes leading politicians, senior civil servants, senior barristers and judges, aristocrats, senior clergy in the established Church of England, the most important financiers and industrialists, governors of the BBC, and the Monarchy, got together and decided to order Cameron to issue an edict to the effect that the Mc Canns should not be approached.

Joe, on this occasion, you are very, very, seriously misguided. I know it and everyone on this forum who reads that statement, knows it! And I think that by now, you know it too. But will you admit that you do? I doubt it.

We are discussing facts.

Facts

 

[ellal]

Their litigation lawyers. They employ the most expensive in the country.

Maybe those expensive litigation lawyers should look into the b*llshit you are spouting...

 

[EFLImpudence]

The establishment. They appealed to Cameron.?

I am amazed you think they would have to 'appeal to Cameron'.

Do you think he is in charge?

 

[joe-90]

I want to know why the investigation started on the premise that the parents and friends are totally without guilt. That's for the investigation to decide. Let them sue me, everything that I've said is in the public domain. Get over it.

 

[ellal]

Aww bless...

joe's toys really don't get a lot of pram time...

 

[joe-90]

Eh? You on drugs?

 

[noseall]

I want to know why the investigation started on the premise that the parents and friends are totally without guilt. That's for the investigation to decide. Let them sue me, everything that I've said is in the public domain. Get over it.

Joe, you said right from the beginning that the investigation into the Mc's is a sham and that the whole thing is being covered up by Cameron and expensive lawyers.

These statements alone make you look ridiculous because they are absurd and a bit comical. No one is going to take you seriously when you say daft stuff like this no matter how true all the other stuff is regards cadaver dogs, blood in car boots or jogging or whatever.

I'm pretty sure even you are aware of what the relationship between the police, politicians, lawyers and the press is like so to suggest what you are suggesting is, bizarre.

 

[joe-90]

well why did the investigation not start at the beginning with forensics? Simple, the police were told not to.

 

[ellal]

This one will give joe a dilemma...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...sy-camp-Greece-charging-couple-abduction.html

Does he...

a. say, "see I told you about those nasty Roma people"?

or

b. suddenly realise that parents of a missing child may not be responsible?

 

[Brigadier]

This one will give joe a dilemma...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...sy-camp-Greece-charging-couple-abduction.html

Does he...



b. suddenly realise that parents of a missing child may not be responsible?

Regardless of anything else, being on the pop with their mates, instead of having their kids with them / stopping in, makes them responsible of poor parenting, if nothing else.

 

[joe-90]

I don't know if they are responsible as they are not being investigated.

 

[ellal]

Regardless of anything else, being on the pop with their mates, instead of having their kids with them / stopping in, makes them responsible of poor parenting, if nothing else.

Please note an earlier reply to joe:

I personally would have never left kids of that age alone, but that doesn't make them guilty of what you are insinuating does it...especially as you have no real facts to back up that insinuation!.

 

[ellal]

I don't know if they are responsible as they are not being investigated.

Ah, so this really is just speculation then?

Nah they've been protected. The establishment don't want the truth. They want a whitewash.

 

[joe-90]

No. The investigation started with no forensics or interview under caution. The investigation started on the assumption that Maddie has been abducted by persons unknown. How do they know that?