No.
Those supermarket parking charges.
- Thread starter joe-90
- Start date
What does what need Joey?
This is getting tedious.
The consideration that Parking Eye gives to the motorist is the use of a parking space for up to two hours.
The consideration that the motorist gives to Parking Eye is that he will vacate that place after two hours, or incur the stated charge.
The consideration that Parking Eye gives to the motorist is the use of a parking space for up to two hours.
The consideration that the motorist gives to Parking Eye is that he will vacate that place after two hours, or incur the stated charge.
Be patient. Poor Joey is not the brightest.
- Joined
- 28 Oct 2005
- Messages
- 31,280
- Reaction score
- 2,000
- Country
In contract law consideration is concerned with the bargain of the contract. A contract is based on an exchange of promises. Each party to a contract must be both a promisor and a promisee. They must each receive a benefit and each suffer a detriment. This benefit or detriment is referred to as consideration.
Consideration must be something of value in the eyes of the law - (Thomas v Thomas) (1842) 2 QB 851. This excludes promises of love and affection, gaming and betting etc. A one sided promise which is not supported by consideration is a gift. The law does not enforce gifts unless they are made by deed.
Consideration must be something of value in the eyes of the law - (Thomas v Thomas) (1842) 2 QB 851. This excludes promises of love and affection, gaming and betting etc. A one sided promise which is not supported by consideration is a gift. The law does not enforce gifts unless they are made by deed.
The value is a parking space.
Do you know how much a parking space is worth in a busy city Joey?
Do you know how much a parking space is worth in a busy city Joey?
I'd guess his backers are running for the hills and his wife might be considering divorce. Let me know how she gets on.
- Joined
- 28 Oct 2005
- Messages
- 31,280
- Reaction score
- 2,000
- Country
Consumer watchdog Which? expressed dismay over today's ruling.
Executive director Richard Lloyd said: "We are concerned this decision waters down the law on penalty charges and may encourage excessive default charges across a wide range of consumer markets.
"Given the possible ramifications of this case for all consumers, we will be looking to intervene again in the Supreme Court hearing."
Executive director Richard Lloyd said: "We are concerned this decision waters down the law on penalty charges and may encourage excessive default charges across a wide range of consumer markets.
"Given the possible ramifications of this case for all consumers, we will be looking to intervene again in the Supreme Court hearing."
You just keep us posted Joey, there's a good lad.
And don't forget your little pearls concerning contract law either. Riveting stuff.
Joe, just park your car where you want, for as long as you want - I'm off 
Similar threads
