If you were to plot how the temperature of the floor varied over time as heat was turned on, and then off, you'd get this sort of shape:
![]()
Read that again, and look at the chart you've drawn.
So ? And do you believe the physics of that ? BTW - the physics is different between electric and wet systems in case you had missed that detail.According to the people who sold the product to the OP, the resolution of the carpet issue is to have more powerful UFH
According to the people who sell radiators, the resolution of the "need for smaller radiators problem" is to run the system at a higher temperature. Isn't that just a case of "properly designing" the system - or do you think that "not properly designing a system" is justification for stating that the technology involved is rubbish and con only ever be rubbish ?
Then there is no point discussing the issue with you. What you seem unable (or just unwilling ?) to consider is that the actual temperature of the room isn't that important. This isn't some laboratory experiment, it's comfort heating - ie the heating provided to make the occupants of the room comfortable. The better it makes people comfortable with the temperature, then the better the heating system - for that is the primary (and really, only) function of a comfort heating system.Not interested - if a thermometer does not say that the air in the room is at 20° then it is not at 20°, no matter how toasty your toes are.
A secondary measure of heating system "quality" is how well it does it for how much energy is put in. If, by making feet comfortable, the room temperature can be dropped by several degrees, then thermal losses from the property will almost certainly be lower - and so the energy used will be less, and the heating bills lower.
