looks like a Russian

They could always get Corbyn to go to Moscow to appease Putin .

Blimey just imagine he was the PM , he would be on the 1st plane to Moscow

"Is there any thing I can do Mr.Putin" " OK we will dismantle our nuclear missiles" "OK Mr Putin we will disband the armed forces"

"Can I lick your boots Mr Putin" " would u like me to bend over further Mr Putin"

"Its OK Mr Putin I brought my own lube"

:LOL::LOL:
 
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
'Russia deny involvement'

What was that tv series Cilla Black did? ( not blind date....)
 
I was referring to the inquiry date, not the date of the criminal act.
You cannot act, as a Home secretary, when the act is committed, but you can do something following the inquiry and apportioning of blame:
Theresa May, home secretary at the time of the inquiry, has failed to act
https://news.sky.com/story/alexande...-did-nothing-after-my-husbands-death-11285681
upload_2018-3-14_9-52-47.png

upload_2018-3-14_9-53-15.png

During the 2014–2015 trial the Scotland Yard representative witnessed that "the evidence suggests that the only credible explanation is .. the Russian state is involved in Litvinenko's murder"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisoning_of_Alexander_Litvinenko
 
I was referring to the inquiry date, not the date of the criminal act.

No you were not.
Do your lies never end? :mrgreen:

You said:
And who was the home secretary then: PM (IE TM).

see your post no 33 at 6.35pm 13/3 :)

dont tell me:
Languages evolve, keyboards do not!
 
I was referring to the inquiry date, not the date of the criminal act.
You cannot act, as a Home secretary, when the act is committed, but you can do something following the inquiry and apportioning of blame:

So a chap gets murdered probably by a Russian hit man in 2006 and you are saying its TM that failed to act? Despite the 3 Labour Home secretaries who preceded her? Have a read of the findings - particularly Appendix A. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploa...493860/The-Litvinenko-Inquiry-H-C-695-web.pdf

From 2006 - 2010 very little happened.
From 2011 within a year of TM taking office - the inquiry began.
From early 2012 there is clear evidence that the Home secretary took an active brief in the inquiry.
The findings of the inquiry were published 4 years later
DC the then PM - announced sanctions against the suspects, which were seen as weak by some.

And this is somehow TM's fault? Contrast the 4 years vs the 1 week of the Salisbury attack?

Perhaps we need stronger sactions? Perhaps the one thing they'd really fear? I know.. lets send in Jeremy Corbyn for some "dialogue and talking". That will really make them take us seriously.
 
Last edited:
The findings of the inquiry were published 4 years later
DC the then PM - announced sanctions against the suspects, which were seen as weak by some.
Precisely, when TM was Home secretary.
I am confident that the measures introduced by DC was on the advice of his Home Secretary, who was........?
 
What should she have done that she could have done at the time?
 
They could always get Corbyn to go to Moscow to appease Putin .

Blimey just imagine he was the PM , he would be on the 1st plane to Moscow

"Is there any thing I can do Mr.Putin" " OK we will dismantle our nuclear missiles" "OK Mr Putin we will disband the armed forces"

"Can I lick your boots Mr Putin" " would u like me to bend over further Mr Putin"

"Its OK Mr Putin I brought my own lube"

:LOL::LOL:

so like Trump. Fired Tillerson via twitter ... :mrgreen:
 

So we agree that the then current Home secretary might have done this at the time? or perhaps the one after? or perhaps the one after that?

Is really immanent security briefing news - 4-10 years later?
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top