Isn't this sweet

[Notch7]

They both agree

you linked that article as though it was proof of racism.
where is that proof.

Also the article was published before the human genome project was completed -so they cant agree

 

[jasonzyx]

How, then can you accept that there are women?

I do not need to explain myself over and over again because you demand it. Why? Because it's a waste of time as you don't have the ability of logic. You've made something up out of thin air then convinced yourself it's true - there is no evidence and nor will you be willing to change your view. Being 'right' for you is everything and you'd never ever change your mind, even when it's as plain as day to everyone else that you're wrong.

I also think you're in absolutely no position to complain about insults when it's you who is calling people racist without any proof. You're an hateful individual who thinks he's better than anyone else when the reality is the opposite. An individual who jumps to conclusions without a shred of evidence or intelligence and does his best to create divide here on a DIY forum.

You're also a liar.

incorrect, you have not provided any evidence that is true.

it is your opinion.

He cannot tell the difference. He has no ability to think logically...

So the three main proponents of racial essentialism have been offered the chance to prove categorically that they are not racist, by stating that they do not ascribe to the inherently racist philosophy of racial essentialism.
Do they take that opportunity? No! They avoid the simple question.
It doesn't take much logic to understand why.
What do they do instead, one of them resorts to silliness, another resorts to abuse and insult, and the other persists with his denial of the obvious, trying to circle his way round the scientific definitions.

What more proof is required that these three are fundamentally racist?

 

[Notch7]

So the three main proponents of racial essentialism have been offered the chance to prove categorically that they are not racist, by stating that they do not ascribe to the inherently racist philosophy of racial essentialism.
Do they take that opportunity? No! They avoid the simple question.
It doesn't take much logic to understand why.
What do they do instead, one of them resorts to silliness, another resorts to abuse and insult, and the other persists with his denial of the obvious, trying to circle his way round the scientific definitions.

What more proof is required that these three are fundamentally racist?

oh dear oh dear

Himmie cant provide the proof so he has resorted to his usual drivel.

Once again, where in the article you linked does it prove racism?

Whether somebody believes in a single race, or more than one human race, that is not the determining factor on to whether they are racist. I have asked you multiple times to prove otherwise, but you have neither answered or provided any proof. I wonder why

I expect you will be apologising for your error any moment

 

[sodthisforfun]

So the three main proponents of racial essentialism have been offered the chance to prove categorically that they are not racist, by stating that they do not ascribe to the inherently racist philosophy of racial essentialism.
Do they take that opportunity? No! They avoid the simple question.
It doesn't take much logic to understand why.
What do they do instead, one of them resorts to silliness, another resorts to abuse and insult, and the other persists with his denial of the obvious, trying to circle his way round the scientific definitions.

What more proof is required that these three are fundamentally racist?

You've been offered the chance again and again to prove that we are racist. And you don't. I wonder why?

Hint. Your opinion is NOT proof.

Another hint: Without proof, means you are a liar.

You'd rather be abusive and call people racists without a shred of evidence. It's up to you to prove that we are racists, without a shadow of doubt because you are the accuser.

 

[durhamplumber]

So the three main proponents of racial essentialism have been offered the chance to prove categorically that they are not racist, by stating that they do not ascribe to the inherently racist philosophy of racial essentialism.
Do they take that opportunity? No! They avoid the simple question.
It doesn't take much logic to understand why.
What do they do instead, one of them resorts to silliness, another resorts to abuse and insult, and the other persists with his denial of the obvious, trying to circle his way round the scientific definitions.

What more proof is required that these three are fundamentally racist?

You do seem very obsessive about hating people and racism..I do think,like BAS you are self obsessed with being argumentative and pedantic rather than having a general dislike of racism and lovin everyone on the planet.I do think you are a troubled soul who would benefit more from mixing with people and less time googling and typing.Brexiteers are a different race to you!!!!

 

[sodthisforfun]

You do seem very obsessive about hating people and racism..I do think,like BAS you are self obsessed with being argumentative and pedantic rather than having a general dislike of racism and lovin everyone on the planet.

100%.

 

[durhamplumber]

Hint. Your opinion is NOT proof.

Precisely...

 

[ban-all-sheds]

I dont have to, you are the one that made the claim there is only 1 race -which you have yet to prove

I see you are still clinging to the idea that you should be so ($&*"W*%&~ thick as to promote the idea that if you claim something is true it is up to everybody else to prove it isn't, ignoring the fact that for you to claim it in the first place you MUST have evidence.

 

[durhamplumber]

I see you are still clinging to the idea that you should be so ($&*"W*%&~ thick as to promote the idea that if you claim something is true it is up to everybody else to prove it isn't, ignoring the fact that for you to claim it in the first place you MUST have evidence.

Lol....new week,,same old rot from BAS...like religion you mean...Absolutely no scientific evidence to prove God exists,yet half the planet believe,and accept it.. And you have this weird perception that whatever you say,is fact!.

 

[ban-all-sheds]

I dont have to, you are the one that made the claim there is only 1 race -which you have yet to prove

Anyway - here is the proof.

It states quite categorically here and here that there is no scientific basis for the idea that Homo sapiens contains multiple races.

Feel free to adduce information which says that there is.

 

[ban-all-sheds]

Lol....new week,,same old rot from BAS...like religion you mean...Atbsolutely no scientific evidence to prove God exists,yet half the planet believe,and accept it.

People believe and accept all sorts of incorrect things - that's the point.

 

[durhamplumber]

Anyway - here is the proof.

It states quite categorically here and here that there is no scientific basis for the idea that Homo sapiens contains multiple races.

Feel free to adduce information which says that there is.

Does it matter?...The root of your nonsense is that brexiteers are all racist,,,no remoaners are,,,which is nonsense

 

[Notch7]

I see you are still clinging to the idea that you should be so ($&*"W*%&~ thick as to promote the idea that if you claim something is true it is up to everybody else to prove it isn't, ignoring the fact that for you to claim it in the first place you MUST have evidence.

Yes I agree - I dont know why Jasonzyx or you cant get it.

 

[durhamplumber]

Anyway - here is the proof.

It states quite categorically here and here that there is no scientific basis for the idea that Homo sapiens contains multiple races.

Feel free to adduce information which says that there is.

Stay well clear of BAS dodgy linkies!!!

 

[ban-all-sheds]

​

How, then can you accept that there are women?

Science recognises gender differences in Homo sapiens.

It does not recognise racial ones.

Prove that it does or STFU.